Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on
- PMID: 35834113
- PMCID: PMC9314484
- DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00601-3
Variation among DNA banking consent forms: points for clinicians to bank on
Abstract
Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) banking is an important laboratory service that preserves the option of future genetic testing. DNA bank consent forms are a critical tool to facilitate thorough and valid informed consent. The objectives of this study were to assess the level of consistency of current clinical DNA banking consent forms with the American Society of Human Genetics (ASHG) and the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidance and to explore variation among the forms. The content analysis matrix included key points identified from the ASHG and ACMG documents (including benefits/risks, sample storage, access, disposition, and communication) and additional points beyond the ASHG and ACMG documents identified from the consent forms themselves during the analysis process. Forms were assessed for language addressing each point. Five consent forms were identified and analyzed for twelve key points and eight additional points. The average consistency for key points was 10.8/12 (range 8/12 to 12/12). The range for additional points was 1/8 to 5/8. There was variation across forms in the details provided related to key and additional points. Gaps in clinical DNA banking consent forms are barriers to achieving informed consent. Clinicians can consider the consent key and additional points discussed here to supplement and enrich their clinical DNA banking informed consent discussions, promote stewardship, and maximize downstream utility of banked DNA. The identification of multiple additional points beyond the ASHG and ACMG documents' key points indicates a need for this guidance to be updated.
Keywords: Biobanking; DNA banking; Informed consent; Stewardship.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Darci L. Sternen is employed by Seattle Children’s Hospital Laboratory, which offered a DNA bank service until 2020. Laura M. Amendola is an employee of Illumina, Inc. Samuel J. Huang declares no potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Variation among Consent Forms for Clinical Whole Exome Sequencing.J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):104-114. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0127-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8. J Genet Couns. 2018. PMID: 28689263 Free PMC article.
-
Umbilical Cord Blood: Counselling, Collection, and Banking.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Sep;37(9):832-844. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30157-2. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26605456
-
Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.Am J Hum Genet. 2015 Jul 2;97(1):6-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.05.022. Am J Hum Genet. 2015. PMID: 26140447 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Data storage and DNA banking for biomedical research: informed consent, confidentiality, quality issues, ownership, return of benefits. A professional perspective.Eur J Hum Genet. 2003 Dec;11 Suppl 2:S88-122. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201114. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003. PMID: 14718939 Review.
-
Simple genetics language as source of miscommunication between genetics researchers and potential research participants in informed consent documents.Public Underst Sci. 2015 Aug;24(6):751-66. doi: 10.1177/0963662514528439. Epub 2014 Apr 21. Public Underst Sci. 2015. PMID: 24751688
References
-
- ACMG statement. Statement on storage and use of genetic materials. American College of Medical Genetics Storage of Genetics Materials Committee. (1995) Am J Hum Genet 57(6):1499 1500. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8533780. Accessed 1 April 2021 - PMC - PubMed
-
- Boycott KM, Hartley T, Biesecker LG, Gibbs RA, Innes AM, Riess O, Belmont J, Dunwoodie SL, Jojic N, Lassmann T, Mackay D, Temple IK, Visel A, Baynam G. A diagnosis for all rare genetic diseases: the horizon and the next frontiers. Cell. 2019;177(1):32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.040. - DOI - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases