Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 6;144(1):7-19.
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.053033. Epub 2021 May 5.

Evidence-Based Assessment of Genes in Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Affiliations

Evidence-Based Assessment of Genes in Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Elizabeth Jordan et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: Each of the cardiomyopathies, classically categorized as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, has a signature genetic theme. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy are largely understood as genetic diseases of sarcomere or desmosome proteins, respectively. In contrast, >250 genes spanning >10 gene ontologies have been implicated in DCM, representing a complex and diverse genetic architecture. To clarify this, a systematic curation of evidence to establish the relationship of genes with DCM was conducted.

Methods: An international panel with clinical and scientific expertise in DCM genetics evaluated evidence supporting monogenic relationships of genes with idiopathic DCM. The panel used the Clinical Genome Resource semiquantitative gene-disease clinical validity classification framework with modifications for DCM genetics to classify genes into categories on the basis of the strength of currently available evidence. Representation of DCM genes on clinically available genetic testing panels was evaluated.

Results: Fifty-one genes with human genetic evidence were curated. Twelve genes (23%) from 8 gene ontologies were classified as having definitive (BAG3, DES, FLNC, LMNA, MYH7, PLN, RBM20, SCN5A, TNNC1, TNNT2, TTN) or strong (DSP) evidence. Seven genes (14%; ACTC1, ACTN2, JPH2, NEXN, TNNI3, TPM1, VCL) including 2 additional ontologies were classified as moderate evidence; these genes are likely to emerge as strong or definitive with additional evidence. Of these 19 genes, 6 were similarly classified for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and 3 for arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Of the remaining 32 genes (63%), 25 (49%) had limited evidence, 4 (8%) were disputed, 2 (4%) had no disease relationship, and 1 (2%) was supported by animal model data only. Of the 16 evaluated clinical genetic testing panels, most definitive genes were included, but panels also included numerous genes with minimal human evidence.

Conclusions: In the curation of 51 genes, 19 had high evidence (12 definitive/strong, 7 moderate). It is notable that these 19 genes explain only a minority of cases, leaving the remainder of DCM genetic architecture incompletely addressed. Clinical genetic testing panels include most high-evidence genes; however, genes lacking robust evidence are also commonly included. We recommend that high-evidence DCM genes be used for clinical practice and that caution be exercised in the interpretation of variants in variable-evidence DCM genes.

Keywords: cardiomyopathy; genetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Quantitative contributions of genetic and experimental evidence to the clinical validity classifications of genes curated for DCM. The sums of genetic (blue) and experimental (orange) evidence scores are shown for genes classified as having definitive, strong, moderate, or limited evidence of a monogenic relationship with DCM. The 2 genes noted with an asterisk had quantitative scores within the quantitative range for a moderate classification, but a limited classification was assigned at panel review (see text). DCM indicates dilated cardiomyopathy.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Genetic architecture of DCM. The genetic architecture of DCM spans 10 gene ontologies, as shown in the innermost colored text circle. The middle text circle specifies genes classified as strong or definitive (bold text) or moderate (regular text) for DCM, organized by gene ontology. Of the 19 DCM genes shown, 14 have previously been evaluated by other Clinical Genome Resource gene curations for HCM or ARVC and channelopathies, including the long-QT syndrome and Brugada S. Each of these genes has also been classified as moderate, strong, or definitive for these other phenotypes, except for NEXN, noted with an asterisk, which has been classified as having limited evidence in HCM. It is expected that with time, as new data emerge that are related to gene-disease relationships in cardiomyopathies and other cardiovascular phenotypes, the structure and orientation of this figure will also evolve. ARVC indicates arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy; Brugada S, Brugada syndrome; Co-Chap, HSP, Co-chaperone, heart shock protein; DCM, dilated cardiomyopathy; HCM, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; and SR, sarcoplasmic reticulum.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Curated genes on clinically available DCM genetic testing panels. The percentages of DCM genetic testing panels that include the genes curated for DCM herein are shown for 16 commercial laboratories identified on the National Center for Biotechnology Information genetic testing registry. Genes are grouped by clinical validity classification, ranging from definitive, strong and moderate (A) to limited, disputed, and no known disease relationship (B). DCM indicates dilated cardiomyopathy.

Comment in

Similar articles

  • Reevaluating the Genetic Contribution of Monogenic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.
    Mazzarotto F, Tayal U, Buchan RJ, Midwinter W, Wilk A, Whiffin N, Govind R, Mazaika E, de Marvao A, Dawes TJW, Felkin LE, Ahmad M, Theotokis PI, Edwards E, Ing AY, Thomson KL, Chan LLH, Sim D, Baksi AJ, Pantazis A, Roberts AM, Watkins H, Funke B, O'Regan DP, Olivotto I, Barton PJR, Prasad SK, Cook SA, Ware JS, Walsh R. Mazzarotto F, et al. Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):387-398. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.037661. Epub 2020 Jan 27. Circulation. 2020. PMID: 31983221 Free PMC article.
  • Targeted next-generation sequencing of candidate genes reveals novel mutations in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.
    Zhao Y, Feng Y, Zhang YM, Ding XX, Song YZ, Zhang AM, Liu L, Zhang H, Ding JH, Xia XS. Zhao Y, et al. Int J Mol Med. 2015 Dec;36(6):1479-86. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2015.2361. Epub 2015 Oct 7. Int J Mol Med. 2015. PMID: 26458567 Free PMC article.
  • Dilated Cardiomyopathy Overview.
    Hershberger RE, Jordan E. Hershberger RE, et al. 2007 Jul 27 [updated 2024 Dec 12]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2025. 2007 Jul 27 [updated 2024 Dec 12]. In: Adam MP, Feldman J, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, Amemiya A, editors. GeneReviews® [Internet]. Seattle (WA): University of Washington, Seattle; 1993–2025. PMID: 20301486 Free Books & Documents. Review.
  • Emerging concepts in arrhythmogenic dilated cardiomyopathy.
    Zegkos T, Panagiotidis T, Parcharidou D, Efthimiadis G. Zegkos T, et al. Heart Fail Rev. 2021 Sep;26(5):1219-1229. doi: 10.1007/s10741-020-09933-z. Heart Fail Rev. 2021. PMID: 32056050 Review.
  • Genetic testing for dilated cardiomyopathy in clinical practice.
    Lakdawala NK, Funke BH, Baxter S, Cirino AL, Roberts AE, Judge DP, Johnson N, Mendelsohn NJ, Morel C, Care M, Chung WK, Jones C, Psychogios A, Duffy E, Rehm HL, White E, Seidman JG, Seidman CE, Ho CY. Lakdawala NK, et al. J Card Fail. 2012 Apr;18(4):296-303. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2012.01.013. Epub 2012 Feb 15. J Card Fail. 2012. PMID: 22464770 Free PMC article.

Cited by

References

    1. Falk RH, Hershberger RE. Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO, Mann DL, Tomaselli G, eds. The dilated, restrictive, and infiltrative cardiomyopathies. In: Braunwald’s Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. 2018. 11th Edition. Elsevier
    1. Jarcho JA, McKenna W, Pare JA, Solomon SD, Holcombe RF, Dickie S, Levi T, Donis-Keller H, Seidman JG, Seidman CE. Mapping a gene for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to chromosome 14q1. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1372–1378. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198911163212005 - PubMed
    1. Graber HL, Unverferth DV, Baker PB, Ryan JM, Baba N, Wooley CF. Evolution of a hereditary cardiac conduction and muscle disorder: a study involving a family with six generations affected. Circulation. 1986;74:21–35. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.1.21 - PubMed
    1. Nava A, Bauce B, Basso C, Muriago M, Rampazzo A, Villanova C, Daliento L, Buja G, Corrado D, Danieli GA, et al. . Clinical profile and long-term follow-up of 37 families with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:2226–2233. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00997-9 - PubMed
    1. Geisterfer-Lowrance AA, Kass S, Tanigawa G, Vosberg HP, McKenna W, Seidman CE, Seidman JG. A molecular basis for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a beta cardiac myosin heavy chain gene missense mutation. Cell. 1990;62:999–1006. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90274-i - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms