Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec;15(6):961-975.
doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01002-0. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review

Barbara E Gubler-Gut  1 , Johannes Pöhlmann  2 , Aline Flatz  3 , Matthias Schwenkglenks  4   5 , Sabine Rohrmann  6
Affiliations
Review

Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries: a systematic review

Barbara E Gubler-Gut et al. J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: Physical activity has been shown to improve survival and quality of life of cancer patients. Due to differences in patient populations, healthcare settings, and types of intervention, cost-effectiveness analyses of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors are difficult to compare. Available evidence from breast cancer survivor research has shown inconsistent results, and transfer of results to other types of cancer is not straightforward. This paper systematically reviewed current evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions in cancer survivors independent of cancer type compared to usual care or another experimental intervention.

Methods: The literature search was conducted in seven databases and enhanced by a search for gray literature. Eligible studies were restricted to developed countries and assessed using the CHEERS, CHEC, and PHILIPS checklists. The study protocol was pre-published in PROSPERO.

Results: Seven studies, five cost-utility, and two combined cost-utility/cost-effectiveness analyses fully met the inclusion criteria. They covered eight different types of cancer and various interventions. The cost-effectiveness analyses were of moderate to high methodological quality. A high probability of cost-effectiveness was reported in two analyses. One intervention appeared to be not cost-effective, and one to be cost-effective only from an organizational perspective. Three other analyses reported a cost-effectiveness better than US$ 101,195 (€ 80,000) per QALY gained.

Conclusions: Physical activity interventions in cancer survivors of developed countries were cost-effective in some but not all clinical trials reviewed.

Implications for cancer survivors: Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions appear to depend upon the intensity of the activity.

Keywords: Cancer survivor; Cost-effectiveness; Cost-utility; Physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Aline Flatz is employed by Krebsliga Schweiz.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Risk of bias judgment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Cost-effectiveness in Swiss Francs
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Wiseman M. The Second World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research Expert Report. Food, nutrition, physical activity, and the prevention of cancer: a global perspective: utrition Society and BAPEN Medical Symposium on ‘Nutrition support in cancer therapy. Proc Nutr Soc. 2008;67:253–256. doi: 10.1017/S002966510800712X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V, Harewood R, Matz M, Nikšić M, Bonaventure A, Valkov M, Johnson CJ, Estève J, Ogunbiyi OJ, Azevedo E, Silva G, et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet. 2018;391:1023–1075. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)33326-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Boer AG, Taskila TK, Tamminga SJ, Feuerstein M, Frings-Dresen MH, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet] 2015 [cited 2018 Oct 9];Available from: https://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/14651858.CD007569.pub3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adam S, Koch-Gallenkamp L, Bertram H, Eberle A, Holleczek B, Pritzkuleit R, Waldeyer-Sauerland M, Waldmann A, Zeissig SR, Rohrmann S, Brenner H, Arndt V. Health-related quality of life in long-term survivors with localised prostate cancer by therapy-Results from a population-based study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019;28:e13076. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13076. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cramer JD, Johnson JT, Nilsen ML. Pain in head and neck cancer survivors: prevalence, predictors, and quality-of-life impact. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018;159:853–858. doi: 10.1177/0194599818783964. - DOI - PubMed