The Evidence-Based Practice Silent Enemy: Retracted Articles and Their Use in Systematic Reviews
- PMID: 33172213
- PMCID: PMC7711589
- DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8040465
The Evidence-Based Practice Silent Enemy: Retracted Articles and Their Use in Systematic Reviews
Abstract
Today, evidence-based nursing practice strives to improve health care, ensure adherence to treatment, improve health outcomes, and guarantee patient safety. The main scientific documents that nurses should consult, to obtain the best possible evidence, are systematic reviews and meta-analyses. However, this type of scientific document has a major issue if it uses retracted articles that could directly affect the consistency of the results shown in the reviews. The aim of this commentary is to present the current issue represented by the use of retracted articles in meta-analyses of systematic reviews and how researchers could detect them, through the use of different instruments, avoiding them, and providing a reliable SR or meta-analysis that could be useful for day-to-day clinical and research activities.
Keywords: evidence-based practice; nurses; research methodology; retracted articles.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015. PMID: 26447004
-
Screening for Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Feb. Report No.: 19-05257-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2020 Feb. Report No.: 19-05257-EF-1. PMID: 32129963 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Assessment of Methods in Health Care: A Handbook [Internet].Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2016 Dec. SBU Method No. 0010. Stockholm: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU); 2016 Dec. SBU Method No. 0010. PMID: 28876803 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. Epidemiol Prev. 2013. PMID: 23851286 Review. Italian.
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
Cited by
-
Improving the Reliability of Literature Reviews: Detection of Retracted Articles through Academic Search Engines.Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022 May 4;12(5):458-464. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe12050034. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2022. PMID: 35621514 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials