Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise

doi:10.1002/14651858.ED000125

Editorial

. 2018 Sep 13;4(9):ED000125.

doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000125.

Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise

Maria-Inti Metzendorf¹, Robin M Featherstone

Affiliations

PMID: 30215846
PMCID: PMC10845862
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ED000125

Editorial

Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise

Maria-Inti Metzendorf et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018.

. 2018 Sep 13;4(9):ED000125.

doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000125.

Authors

Maria-Inti Metzendorf¹, Robin M Featherstone

Affiliation

¹ Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Germany.

PMID: 30215846
PMCID: PMC10845862
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.ED000125

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Cited by

Investigation of text-mining methodologies to aid the construction of search strategies in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy-a case study.
O'Keefe H, Rankin J, Wallace SA, Beyer F. O'Keefe H, et al. Res Synth Methods. 2023 Jan;14(1):79-98. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1593. Epub 2022 Jul 31. Res Synth Methods. 2023. PMID: 35841125 Free PMC article.
Literature search strategies in dental education and research.
Khurshid Z, Tariq R, Asiri FY, Abid K, Zafar MS. Khurshid Z, et al. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021 Jul 6;16(6):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2021.05.012. eCollection 2021 Dec. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2021. PMID: 34899122 Free PMC article. Review.
Poor Quality in Systematic Reviews on PTSD and EMDR - An Examination of Search Methodology and Reporting.
Opheim E, Andersen PN, Jakobsen M, Aasen B, Kvaal K. Opheim E, et al. Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 9;10:1558. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01558. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31354575 Free PMC article.
Involvement of information specialists and statisticians in systematic reviews.
Waffenschmidt S, Bender R. Waffenschmidt S, et al. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023 Apr 25;39(1):e22. doi: 10.1017/S026646232300020X. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2023. PMID: 37096439 Free PMC article. Review.
Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey.
Grossetta Nardini HK, Batten J, Funaro MC, Garcia-Milian R, Nyhan K, Spak JM, Wang L, Glover JG. Grossetta Nardini HK, et al. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 Nov 27;4:23. doi: 10.1186/s41073-019-0083-5. eCollection 2019. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019. PMID: 31798974 Free PMC article.

References

1. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2005;93(1):74–80. - PMC - PubMed
1. Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian co‐authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2015;68(6):617–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025 - PubMed
1. Higgins J, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Churchill R. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR). community.cochrane.org/mecir‐manual (accessed 31 July 2018)
1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 - PMC - PubMed
1. Koffel JB, Rethlefsen ML. Reproducibility of search strategies is poor in systematic reviews published in high‐impact pediatrics, cardiology and surgery journals: a cross‐sectional study. PLOS One 2016;11(9):e0163309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163309 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations

[1] McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2005;93(1):74–80. - PMC - PubMed

[2] McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2005;93(1):74–80. - PMC - PubMed

[3] Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian co‐authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2015;68(6):617–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025 - PubMed

[4] Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. Librarian co‐authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2015;68(6):617–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025 - PubMed

[5] Higgins J, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Churchill R. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR). community.cochrane.org/mecir‐manual (accessed 31 July 2018)

[6] Higgins J, Lasserson T, Chandler J, Tovey D, Churchill R. Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR). community.cochrane.org/mecir‐manual (accessed 31 July 2018)

[7] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 - PMC - PubMed

[8] Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Medicine 2009;6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 - PMC - PubMed

[9] Koffel JB, Rethlefsen ML. Reproducibility of search strategies is poor in systematic reviews published in high‐impact pediatrics, cardiology and surgery journals: a cross‐sectional study. PLOS One 2016;11(9):e0163309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163309 - PMC - PubMed

[10] Koffel JB, Rethlefsen ML. Reproducibility of search strategies is poor in systematic reviews published in high‐impact pediatrics, cardiology and surgery journals: a cross‐sectional study. PLOS One 2016;11(9):e0163309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163309 - PMC - PubMed

Save citation to file

Email citation

Add to Collections

Add to My Bibliography

Your saved search

Create a file for external citation management software

Your RSS Feed

Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise

Affiliation

Ensuring quality as the basis of evidence synthesis: leveraging information specialists' knowledge, skills, and expertise

Authors

Affiliation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources

Other Literature Sources