Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;106(1):46-56.
doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.82. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review

Angela J Spencer, Jonathan D Eldredge

Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review

Angela J Spencer et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: What roles do librarians and information professionals play in conducting systematic reviews? Librarians are increasingly called upon to be involved in systematic reviews, but no study has considered all the roles librarians can perform. This inventory of existing and emerging roles aids in defining librarians' systematic reviews services.

Methods: For this scoping review, the authors conducted controlled vocabulary and text-word searches in the PubMed; Library, Information Science & Technology Abstracts; and CINAHL databases. We separately searched for articles published in the Journal of the European Association for Health Information and Libraries, Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, the Journal of the Canadian Heath Libraries Association, and Hypothesis. We also text-word searched Medical Library Association annual meeting poster and paper abstracts.

Results: We identified 18 different roles filled by librarians and other information professionals in conducting systematic reviews from 310 different articles, book chapters, and presented papers and posters. Some roles were well known such as searching, source selection, and teaching. Other less documented roles included planning, question formulation, and peer review. We summarize these different roles and provide an accompanying bibliography of references for in-depth descriptions of these roles.

Conclusion: Librarians play central roles in systematic review teams, including roles that go beyond searching. This scoping review should encourage librarians who are fulfilling roles that are not captured here to document their roles in journal articles and poster and paper presentations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mulrow CD. Rationale for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):597–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597. PubMed PMID: 8086953; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2541393. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. BMJ. 1994 Nov 12;309(6964):1286–91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6964.1286. PubMed PMID: 7718048; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2541778. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hunt DL, McKibbon KA. Locating and appraising systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Apr 1;126(7):532–8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-126-7-199704010-00006. PubMed PMID: 9092319. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beverley CA, Booth A, Bath PA. The role of the information specialist in the systematic review process: a health information case study. Health Inf Libr J. 2003 Jun;20(2):65–74. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00411.x. PubMed PMID: 12786905. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harris MR. The librarian’s roles in the systematic review process: a case study. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Jan;93(1):81–7. PubMed PMID: 15685279; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC545126. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources