Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess an article using surrogate end points
- PMID: 28730989
- PMCID: PMC5529160
- DOI: 10.1503/cjs.002217
Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess an article using surrogate end points
Abstract
Phase 3 randomized controlled trials are the widely accepted gold standard through which treatment decisions are made, as they assess the efficacy of a novel treatment against the control on the relevant patient population. The effectiveness of the novel treatment should be derived by measuring patient-important outcomes; however, to accurately assess these outcomes, clinical trials often require extensive patient follow-up and large sample sizes that can incur substantial expense. For this reason, investigators substitute surrogate end points to reduce the sample size and duration of a trial, ultimately reducing cost. The purpose of this article is to help surgeons appraise the surgical literature that use surrogate end points for patient-important outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17. Stroke. 2003. PMID: 12869717
-
Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess a noninferiority trial.Can J Surg. 2017 Dec;60(6):426-432. doi: 10.1503/cjs.000317. Can J Surg. 2017. PMID: 29173262 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of single arm versus randomised phase 2 oncology trial characteristics with phase 3 outcome.Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(17):2501-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.08.004. Epub 2015 Aug 31. Eur J Cancer. 2015. PMID: 26338195
-
Surrogate end points in heart failure.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 May 1;39(9):1414-21. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01773-4. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002. PMID: 11985901 Review.
-
How to Use a Randomized Clinical Trial Addressing a Surgical Procedure: Users' Guide to the Medical Literature.JAMA Surg. 2016 Jul 1;151(7):657-62. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0072. JAMA Surg. 2016. PMID: 27027568 Review.
Cited by
-
Are ultra-short heart rate variability features good surrogates of short-term ones? State-of-the-art review and recommendations.Healthc Technol Lett. 2018 Mar 14;5(3):94-100. doi: 10.1049/htl.2017.0090. eCollection 2018 Jun. Healthc Technol Lett. 2018. PMID: 29922478 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fleming TR, DeMets D. Surrogate end points in clinical trials: Are we being misled? Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:605. - PubMed
-
- Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade M, et al. Users’ guides to the medical literature: a manual for evidence-based clinical practice. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill; 2015.
-
- Yudkin JS, Lipska K, Montori V. The idolatry of the surrogate. BMJ. 2011;343:d7995. - PubMed
-
- Prentice RL. Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. Stat Med. 1989;8:431–40. - PubMed
-
- Boissel JP, Collet J, Moleur P, et al. Surrogate endpoints: a basis for a rational approach. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1992;43:235–44. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical