Searching MEDLINE for randomized clinical trials involving care of the newborn
- PMID: 2648304
Searching MEDLINE for randomized clinical trials involving care of the newborn
Abstract
Randomized clinical trials make up only a small fraction of published articles concerning care of the newborn infant and an even smaller fraction of articles about all human subjects. The busy pediatrician who wants to keep abreast of the medical literature requires strategies to detect such relevant studies promptly and reliably. Computer searching of MEDLINE is an attractive, potentially powerful but not sufficiently validated means of achieving this goal. Therefore, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of two MEDLINE search strategies designed to detect randomized clinical trials for prevention and treatment of newborn diseases among all original articles about human subjects appearing in ten pediatric and general medical journals during 1985 were determined. The yield of both MEDLINE searches was compared to that of a manual search. Fifty-three randomized clinical trials of newborn care were identified by hand search among 233 articles concerning care of the newborn and 2,988 original articles about human subjects. The sensitivities of the MEDLINE searches were 53% and 34%, respectively, and the positive predictive values were 82% and 69%, respectively. Specificity of both computer searches was virtually 100%. Twenty-one randomized clinical trials were not identified by either MEDLINE search strategy, 17 of them for failure of the indexer to assign any methodologic terms at all or failure to assign sufficiently stringent methodologic terms. Consequently, sensitivities were higher, 77% and 68% respectively, when no methodologic terms were used during repeat searches. However, positive predictive values decreased concomitantly to 20% or less.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
Benchmarking the clinical prosthetic dental literature on MEDLINE.J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):533-41. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129301. J Prosthet Dent. 2002. PMID: 12474005
-
Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey.BMC Med. 2004 Jun 9;2:23. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-2-23. BMC Med. 2004. PMID: 15189561 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of search strategies on CD Plus/MEDLINE.CMAJ. 1991 Sep 1;145(5):457-64. CMAJ. 1991. PMID: 1878827 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of search strategies for recalling double-blind trials from MEDLINE.Dan Med Bull. 1991 Dec;38(6):476-8. Dan Med Bull. 1991. PMID: 1802637
-
State of the art in comparative cancer clinical trials.Cancer. 1987 Dec 1;60(11):2811-5. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19871201)60:11<2811::aid-cncr2820601136>3.0.co;2-p. Cancer. 1987. PMID: 3315175 Review.
Cited by
-
Which resources should be used to identify RCT/CCTs for systematic reviews: a systematic review.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Aug 10;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-5-24. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005. PMID: 16092960 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In search of controlled evidence for health care quality improvement.J Med Syst. 1997 Feb;21(1):21-32. doi: 10.1023/a:1022887224126. J Med Syst. 1997. PMID: 9172067
-
Use of a multi-application computer workstation in a clinical setting.Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994 Oct;82(4):382-9. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1994. PMID: 7841907 Free PMC article.
-
Handsearching versus electronic searching to identify reports of randomized trials.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):MR000001. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000001.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007. PMID: 17443625 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beyond relevance--characteristics of key papers for clinicians: an exploratory study in an academic setting.Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Jul;84(3):351-8. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996. PMID: 8883983 Free PMC article.