Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 May-Jun;19(3):258-62.
doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.145782.

Authors, authorship order, the moving finger writes

Jayakumar Avula  1 , Haritha Avula  1
Affiliations
Review

Authors, authorship order, the moving finger writes

Jayakumar Avula et al. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 May-Jun.

Abstract

There has been a phenomenal increase in the number of research papers with multiple authors. Increasing academic pressures and halo around individuals with prolific publications have made many aspirants to claim authorship. Increasing number of authors has brought its own issues of author credits, disputes, rivalry, and a degree of unwelcome scramble for credit sharing. Many unresolved issues about authorship and various guidelines and admonitions are more often infringed than adhered to. The position of the first and last author seem to be well recognized in medical and dental journals, but the fate of middle authors is left to guessing and often of inconsequential importance. Most of these issues, as well as fraud, misconduct in medical research publications, have been discussed amply but too of no avail. It is comforting to know that except for small shouts and whispers, dental research has been relatively free from scams and frauds. The complacency, however, needs to be tempered with constant vigil against fraud, falsification and fabrication of research reports. Honest authorship, vigilant editors, robust peer review, and a discerning readership are the sine qua non for a good research paper. Academic institutions and selection committees should be concentrating on the quality of research papers and not enamored of their number.

Keywords: Author; authorship; research; scientific writing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bequava A. Scientific misconduct: A problem without solution. Br Med J. 2007;335:524. - PubMed
    1. Jones AW. Some thoughts and reflections on authorship. Alcohol Alcohol. 1996;31:11–5. - PubMed
    1. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) [Last accessed on 2014 Aug 04]. Available from: http://www.icmje.org/urm_main.html .
    1. Rennie D, Yank V, Emanuel L. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. JAMA. 1997;278:579–85. - PubMed
    1. Shapiro DW, Wenger NS, Shapiro MF. The contributions of authors to multiauthored biomedical research papers. JAMA. 1994;271:438–42. - PubMed