Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews: A methodological review
- PMID: 25726430
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.02.002
Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews: A methodological review
Abstract
Background: Systematic reviews of literature are increasingly important in healthcare. While reviewers are expected to follow reporting guidelines, inconsistencies may be observed in presentation of reviews, potentially detracting from the credibility of findings. Predetermined eligibility criteria are fundamental to the systematic process of reviewing, and should be given primacy in authors' reports.
Method: This methodological review assessed the specification and application of eligibility criteria in systematic reviews in three leading generic nursing journals.
Results: While reporting guidelines were generally followed, major anomalies were revealed by this review. Over three-quarters of review papers placed eligibility criteria after description of the search strategy. Unjustified time restrictions were common, and many flowcharts omitted vital information.
Conclusion: Greater scrutiny of systematic reviews submitted to nursing journals would enhance the quality of reports and contribute to more robust evidence-based practice.
Keywords: Nursing journals; Reporting guidelines; Systematic reviews.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Sins of omission and commission in systematic reviews in nursing: A commentary on McRae et al. (2015).Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jul;52(7):1277-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 20. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015. PMID: 25851281 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews published in prominent medical journals: a methodological review.J Eval Clin Pract. 2015 Dec;21(6):1052-8. doi: 10.1111/jep.12448. Epub 2015 Sep 14. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015. PMID: 26370723 Review.
-
The methodological quality of systematic reviews published in high-impact nursing journals: a review of the literature.J Clin Nurs. 2014 Feb;23(3-4):315-32. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12132. Epub 2013 Mar 13. J Clin Nurs. 2014. PMID: 23489745 Review.
-
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 5;95(11):e771-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00597. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013. PMID: 23780547
-
Characteristics of Reviews Published in Nursing Literature: A Methodological Review.ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2018 Jan/Mar;41(1):30-40. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0000000000000180. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2018. PMID: 28825935
-
Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 7;7(2):e013905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013905. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28174224 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Implementing advance care planning in palliative and end of life care: a scoping review of community nursing perspectives.BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 28;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04888-4. BMC Geriatr. 2024. PMID: 38549045 Free PMC article.
-
Why do they take the risk? A systematic review of the qualitative literature on informal sector abortions in settings where abortion is legal.BMC Womens Health. 2019 Apr 8;19(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0751-0. BMC Womens Health. 2019. PMID: 30961574 Free PMC article.
-
Targeting vulnerable populations: a synthetic review on alcohol use and risky sexual behaviour among migrant populations.AIDS Res Ther. 2016 Sep 22;13:33. doi: 10.1186/s12981-016-0117-8. eCollection 2016. AIDS Res Ther. 2016. PMID: 27688794 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
