Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Aug;11(8):666-73.
doi: 10.1038/ni.1887. Epub 2010 Jul 20.

Decision checkpoints in the thymus

Andrea C Carpenter  1 , Rémy Bosselut
Affiliations
Review

Decision checkpoints in the thymus

Andrea C Carpenter et al. Nat Immunol. 2010 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Nat Immunol. 2011 Mar;12(3):271

Abstract

The development of T cells in the thymus involves several differentiation and proliferation events, during which hematopoietic precursors give rise to T cells ready to respond to antigen stimulation and undergo effector differentiation. This review addresses signaling and transcriptional checkpoints that control the intrathymic journey of T cell precursors. We focus on the divergence of alphabeta and gammadelta lineage cells and the elaboration of the alphabeta T cell repertoire, with special emphasis on the emergence of transcriptional programs that direct lineage decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. overview of T cell development
Thymic developmental stages are depicted. Expression of CD4 and CD8 separates CD4−CD8− double negative (DN), CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP) and cells expressing either coreceptor (single positive, SP), whereas the expression of CD44 and CD25 defines four DN subsets: CD44+CD25− [DN1], CD44+CD25+ [DN2], CD44−CD25+ [DN3], and CD44−CD25− [DN4]. The earliest precursors, known as ETP, that enter the thymus from the bone marrow are part of an heterogeneous DN1 subset that includes both subsequent intermediates in the T differentiation pathway and cells belonging to other lineages. The DN2 and DN3 subsets are themselves divided into two stages based on the expression of the receptor cKit and of CD27, respectively. Critical checkpoints addressed in the text are shown in red. Rounded rectangles group cell subsets according to the key developmental step they belong to: early uncommitted progenitors (blue), T committed progenitors before the separation of αβ and γδ lineages (purple) and committed αβ (yellow) or γδ (green) lineage cells.
Figure 2
Figure 2. transcriptional circuitries in differentiating αβ T cells
In pre-selection DP thymocytes (left), E2A is thought to promote expression of Rorc and Rag genes, thereby ensuring TCR gene receptor expression and TCRα locus accessibility. In addition, E2A restrains expression of IL-7Rα, Bcl-2 and CCR7, although it is not clear whether such effects are direct or indirect (e.g. through effects on Foxo1 expression). Positive selection signals (right) reduce E2A activity by increasing Id3 expression, indirectly through Erk-dependent up-regulation of Egr proteins. Positively selected thymocytes have ceased expression of DP-stage genes and up-regulated Bcl-2, CCR7 and IL-7Rα, presumably as a result of the termination of E2A activity and of the induction of activators that may include Foxo1. Arrows or block signs do not necessarily indicate direct effects.
Figure 3
Figure 3. CD4-CD8 lineage differentiation
(A) Components of the transcriptional circuitry that promotes CD4-CD8 differentiation are schematically depicted and interconnected at three stages of T cell development. In preselection cells, Runx1-nucleated activities repress Thpok expression. In CD4-differentiating cells, Runx1-mediated Thpok expression is relieved, although Runx1 is still expressed in CD4 cells in which it binds the Thpok gene. Gata3 promotes both Thpok expression and additional developmental events required for CD4 cell differentiation. Thpok prevents Runx3 up-regulation and CD8 differentiation. In CD8-differentiating cells, Thpok repression is maintained, presumably through Runx3. Ets1 promotes Runx3 expression, and binds the Runx3 locus, whereas Stat5 has been reported to relay IL-7 signaling to Runx3. Grey lettering indicates factors not expressed at a particular stage. Other factors (including Tox) are omitted for clarity. Arrows or block signs do not imply direct effects. (B) The ‘kinetic signaling’ model of lineage differentiation posits that intrathymic TCR signaling, regardless of MHC specificity, represses Cd8 expression, causing thymocytes to adopt a CD4+CD8int surface phenotype. TCR signaling in MHC II-restricted thymocytes is not affected by CD8 down-regulation, and its persistence eventually seals CD4 commitment. In contrast, TCR signaling in MHC I-restricted thymocytes is impaired by CD8 down-regulation, and its cessation causes ‘coreceptor reversal’ i.e. the cessation of Cd4 expression and the resumption of Cd8 expression.
Figure 4
Figure 4. An hypothetical transcriptional network in mature thymocytes and T cells
Based on analyses in mature T cells, a transcriptional circuitry is proposed in mature thymocytes, that enables expression of IL-7Rα, CCR7 and Klf12, which itself controls thymic egress by increasing expression of the receptor for sphingosine 1-phophate (S1P1), T cell trafficking and quiescence. Foxo1 activity is inhibited by PI-3 kinase-dependent phosphorylation, that promotes its sequestration in the cytosol, contributing to the self-limiting IL-7Rα expression characteristic of mature T cells. It may also act as a ‘licensing’ factor in the thymus to prevent the release of self reactive thymocytes due to their persistent TCR signaling.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Hayday AC. Gammadelta T cells and the lymphoid stress-surveillance response. Immunity. 2009;31:184–196. - PubMed
    1. Matthews AG, Oettinger MA. RAG: a recombinase diversified. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:817–821. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhandoola A, von Boehmer H, Petrie HT, Zuniga-Pflucker JC. Commitment and developmental potential of extrathymic and intrathymic T cell precursors: plenty to choose from. Immunity. 2007;26:678–689. - PubMed
    1. Chi AW, Bell JJ, Zlotoff DA, Bhandoola A. Untangling the T branch of the hematopoiesis tree. Curr Opin Immunol. 2009;21:121–126. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feyerabend TB, et al. Deletion of Notch1 converts pro-T cells to dendritic cells and promotes thymic B cells by cell-extrinsic and cell-intrinsic mechanisms. Immunity. 2009;30:67–79. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances