Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies
- PMID: 19461821
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies
Abstract
Diagnosis is a critical component of health care. The world of diagnostic tests is highly dynamic. New tests are developed at a fast pace and technology of existing tests is continuously being improved. However, clinicians, policy makers, and patients routinely face a range of questions regarding diagnostic tests. Well designed diagnostic test accuracy studies can help in making these decisions, provided that they transparently and fully report their participants, tests, methods, and results (as facilitated). For example, by the standards for the reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) statement. Exaggerated and biased results from poorly designed and reported diagnostic test studies can trigger their premature dissemination and lead physicians into making incorrect treatment decisions. Thus, a diagnostic test is useful only to the extent that it distinguishes between conditions or disorders that might otherwise be confused. While almost any test can differentiate healthy persons from severely affected ones, appropriate diagnostic tests should differentiate mild and moderate forms of disease. Shortcomings in a study design and interpretation can affect estimates of diagnostic accuracy. Thus, quality diagnostic studies are essential in medicine in general and interventional pain management in particular. The STARD initiative was developed to improve the accuracy and completeness in the reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy and provide guidance to assist in reducing the potential for bias in the study and to evaluate a study's generalizability. In the practice of interventional pain management, in addition to diagnostic tests which include laboratory tests, imaging tests, and physical examination, diagnostic interventional techniques are crucial. Interventional techniques as a diagnostic tool in painful conditions is important due to multiple challenging clinical situations, which include the purely subjective nature of pain and underdetermined and uncertain pathophysiology in most painful spinal conditions. Precision diagnostic blocks are used to clarify these challenging clinical situations in order to determine the pathophysiology of clinical pain, the site of nociception, and the pathway of afferent neural signals. Part 5 of evidence-based medicine (EBM) in interventional pain management describes the various aspects of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Similar articles
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50. Pain Physician. 2009. PMID: 19787009
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):161-86. Pain Physician. 2008. PMID: 18354710 Review.
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: Part 7: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.Pain Physician. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(6):929-63. Pain Physician. 2009. PMID: 19935980 Review.
-
Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1321-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.050. Epub 2006 Sep 14. Fertil Steril. 2006. PMID: 16978620
-
Evidence-based interventional pain management: principles, problems, potential and applications.Pain Physician. 2007 Mar;10(2):329-56. Pain Physician. 2007. PMID: 17387356 Review.
Cited by
-
Quality assessment and factor analysis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of endoscopic ultrasound diagnosis.PLoS One. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0120911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120911. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25905713 Free PMC article.
-
Validity of outcome measures used in randomized clinical trials and observational studies in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 19;13(1):1068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-27218-3. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36658179 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol for diagnostic test accuracy study: the efficacy of screening for common dental diseases by dental care professionals.BMC Oral Health. 2013 Sep 21;13:45. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-13-45. BMC Oral Health. 2013. PMID: 24053760 Free PMC article.
-
Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Safety.Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):985-1002. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00306-4. Epub 2021 Sep 3. Pain Ther. 2021. PMID: 34478120 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The efficacy of screening for common dental diseases by hygiene-therapists: a diagnostic test accuracy study.J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):70S-78S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514567335. Epub 2015 Jan 20. J Dent Res. 2015. PMID: 25604256 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical