Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies
- PMID: 18313560
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.05.013
Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the yield from searching a range of bibliographic databases and additional sources to identify test accuracy studies for systematic reviews.
Study design and setting: We examined eight systematic reviews and their database searches: MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Science Citation Index, LILACS, Pascal, and CENTRAL. We used studies included in each systematic review as the "gold standard," against which yield was estimated. For each database, we classified studies in each gold standard set as being (1) included in the database and identified by searches, (2) included and not identified, and (3) not included in the database.
Results: No search identified all studies in any gold standard set. EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and BIOSIS contained studies that were not on MEDLINE. Over 20% of studies in the gold standard sets were not identified by searching MEDLINE. Six studies on LILACS were not on any other database. Eight gold standard studies were not included in any of the databases, and a further 22 were not identified by the electronic search strategies.
Conclusions: Systematic reviews of test accuracy studies should search a range of databases. Even searches designed to be very sensitive, that do not use study design filters, can fail to identify relevant studies.
Similar articles
-
Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 11;2013(9):MR000022. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000022.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24022476 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future?Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 25;2:78. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-78. Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 24066664 Free PMC article.
-
Optimizing literature search in systematic reviews - are MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL enough for identifying effect studies within the area of musculoskeletal disorders?BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 22;16(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0264-6. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27875992 Free PMC article.
-
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 6;6(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29208034 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The contribution of databases to the results of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Sep 26;16(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0232-1. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016. PMID: 27670136 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning in Differentiating Gliomas from Primary CNS Lymphomas: A Systematic Review, Reporting Quality, and Risk of Bias Assessment.AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 Apr;43(4):526-533. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7473. Epub 2022 Mar 31. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022. PMID: 35361577 Free PMC article.
-
The association of depression with adherence to antihypertensive medications: a systematic review.J Hypertens. 2010 Sep;28(9):1785-95. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833b4a6f. J Hypertens. 2010. PMID: 20531223 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic test accuracy of remote, multidomain cognitive assessment (telephone and video call) for dementia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 8;4(4):CD013724. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013724.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35395108 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Improving search efficiency for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: an exploratory study to assess the viability of limiting to MEDLINE, EMBASE and reference checking.Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 26;4:82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0074-7. Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26113080 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
