Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2007 Dec;16(6):456-61.
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.020305.

Impact of short evidence summaries in discharge letters on adherence of practitioners to discharge medication. A cluster-randomised controlled trial

R Kunz  1 , K Wegscheider, G Guyatt, W Zielinski, N Rakowsky, N Donner-Banzhoff, S Müller-Lissner
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of short evidence summaries in discharge letters on adherence of practitioners to discharge medication. A cluster-randomised controlled trial

R Kunz et al. Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Dec.

Abstract

Background: International concern about quality of medical care has led to intensive study of interventions to ensure care is consistent with best evidence. Simple, inexpensive, feasible and effective interventions remain limited.

Objective: We examined the impact of one-sentence evidence summaries appended to consultants' letters to primary care practitioners on adherence of the practitioners to recommendations made by the consultants regarding medication for patients with chronic medical problems.

Design: Cluster-randomised trial.

Setting: Secondary/primary care interface (urban district hospital/referral practices).

Participants: 178 practices received one or more discharge letters with evidence summaries. The 66 practices in the intervention group provided feedback on 172 letters, and the 56 practices in the control group provided feedback on 96 letters.

Results: Appending an evidence summary to discharge letters resulted in a decrease in non-adherence to discharge medication from 29.6% to 18.5% (difference adjusted for underlying medical condition 12.5%; p = 0.039). Among the five possible reasons for discontinuing discharge medication, the evidence summaries seemed to have the largest impact on budget-related reasons for discontinuation (2.6% in the intervention versus 10.7% in the control group (p = 0.052)). Most clinicians (72%) were enthusiastic about continuing receiving evidence summaries with discharge letters in routine care.

Conclusions: The one-sentence evidence summary is a simple, inexpensive, well-accepted intervention that may improve primary care practitioners' adherence to evidence-based consultant recommendations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Grimshaw J M, Shirran L, Thomas R.et al Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 200139II2–NaN45. - PubMed
    1. Grimshaw J M, Thomas R E, MacLennan G.et al Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 20048iiiiv 1–iiiiv72. - PubMed
    1. Bennett J W, Glasziou P P. Computerised reminders and feedback in medication management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Med J Aust 2003178217–222. - PubMed
    1. Freeman A C, Sweeney K. Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study. BMJ 20013231100–1102. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cranney M, Walley T. Same information, different decisions: the influence of evidence on the management of hypertension in the elderly. Br J Gen Pract 199646661–663. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms