Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Jan;95(1):56-63.

Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians

Affiliations

Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians

Carol Tenopir et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2007 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the journal reading patterns of pediatrician members of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and compare results to similar surveys of medical faculty and physicians. The research also explored factors that might influence changes in reading patterns in the future, such as adoption of PDA technology.

Methodology: A random sample of 2,000 AAP members was drawn from the AAP membership list, with paper surveys distributed in mid-2004.

Settings/subjects: Six hundred sixty-six pediatrician AAP members participated in a survey of reading behavior, with a total of 1,351 members answering some questions about technology use.

Results: The hypotheses that pediatricians read many journal articles each month, read each article on average quite quickly, read heavily from personal subscriptions, read from both print and electronic journals, and read for many purposes were all supported. Pediatricians read journal articles primarily for current awareness and most often rely on quick reading from print journals for current awareness. Reading for research, writing, and presentations are more likely from library-provided electronic journals.

Discussion/conclusion: Convenience and purpose of reading are key factors that explain reading patterns of pediatricians. Print personal subscriptions are convenient for current awareness reading, while electronic journals systems are convenient for reading for research because they provide access to a broader range of journals. Publishers and librarians must understand the purposes and patterns of reading to design appropriate journals and services. Pediatricians read many current articles very quickly and from many different locations. Pediatricians under the age of thirty-five are more likely to use PDAs, suggesting that articles delivered to a handheld device might be accepted as convenient in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tenopir C, King DW, and Bush A. Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Apr; 92(2):233–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andrews JE, Pearce KA, Ireson C, and Love MM. Information-seeking behaviors of practitioners in a primary care practice-based research network (PBRN); J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Apr; 93(2):206–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dawes M, Sampson U. Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. Int J Med Inf. 2003 Aug; 71(9):9–15. - PubMed
    1. Chimoskey SJ, Norris TE. Use of MEDLINE by rural physicians in Washington State. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul; 6(4):332–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stinson ER, Mueller DA. Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs. Conducted through personal interviews. JAMA. 1980 Jan; 243(2):140–3. - PubMed

Publication types