Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians
- PMID: 17252067
- PMCID: PMC1773049
Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the journal reading patterns of pediatrician members of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and compare results to similar surveys of medical faculty and physicians. The research also explored factors that might influence changes in reading patterns in the future, such as adoption of PDA technology.
Methodology: A random sample of 2,000 AAP members was drawn from the AAP membership list, with paper surveys distributed in mid-2004.
Settings/subjects: Six hundred sixty-six pediatrician AAP members participated in a survey of reading behavior, with a total of 1,351 members answering some questions about technology use.
Results: The hypotheses that pediatricians read many journal articles each month, read each article on average quite quickly, read heavily from personal subscriptions, read from both print and electronic journals, and read for many purposes were all supported. Pediatricians read journal articles primarily for current awareness and most often rely on quick reading from print journals for current awareness. Reading for research, writing, and presentations are more likely from library-provided electronic journals.
Discussion/conclusion: Convenience and purpose of reading are key factors that explain reading patterns of pediatricians. Print personal subscriptions are convenient for current awareness reading, while electronic journals systems are convenient for reading for research because they provide access to a broader range of journals. Publishers and librarians must understand the purposes and patterns of reading to design appropriate journals and services. Pediatricians read many current articles very quickly and from many different locations. Pediatricians under the age of thirty-five are more likely to use PDAs, suggesting that articles delivered to a handheld device might be accepted as convenient in the future.
Similar articles
-
Medical faculty's use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists.J Med Libr Assoc. 2004 Apr;92(2):233-41. J Med Libr Assoc. 2004. PMID: 15098053 Free PMC article.
-
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063. Pediatrics. 2004. PMID: 15520092
-
Online journals' impact on the citation patterns of medical faculty.J Med Libr Assoc. 2005 Apr;93(2):223-8. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005. PMID: 15858625 Free PMC article.
-
Biomedical journals: keeping up and reading critically.J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2006 Sep;45(5):8-15. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2006. PMID: 16995641 Review.
-
[How to Find, Read, and Summarize Papers].Brain Nerve. 2022 Jan;74(1):10-13. doi: 10.11477/mf.1416201967. Brain Nerve. 2022. PMID: 34992162 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
An application of Bradford's law: identification of the core journals of pediatric neurosurgery and a regional comparison of citation density.Childs Nerv Syst. 2014 Oct;30(10):1717-27. doi: 10.1007/s00381-014-2481-9. Epub 2014 Aug 7. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014. PMID: 25098356
-
Evaluation of the informatician perspective: determining types of research papers preferred by clinicians.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jul 5;17(Suppl 2):74. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0463-z. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017. PMID: 28699568 Free PMC article.
-
U.S. News & World Report Ophthalmology Hospital Rankings and Research Productivity.J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2021 Jun 30;13(1):e46-e50. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722743. eCollection 2021 Jan. J Acad Ophthalmol (2017). 2021. PMID: 37389157 Free PMC article.
-
Relation of study quality, concordance, take home message, funding, and impact in studies of influenza vaccines: systematic review.BMJ. 2009 Feb 12;338:b354. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b354. BMJ. 2009. PMID: 19213766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties.BMJ. 2012 May 17;344:e3223. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e3223. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 22597353 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dawes M, Sampson U. Knowledge management in clinical practice: a systematic review of information seeking behavior in physicians. Int J Med Inf. 2003 Aug; 71(9):9–15. - PubMed
-
- Stinson ER, Mueller DA. Survey of health professionals' information habits and needs. Conducted through personal interviews. JAMA. 1980 Jan; 243(2):140–3. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous