Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jun;31(6):776-84.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2627-z. Epub 2005 Apr 6.

The concept of "baby lung"

Affiliations

The concept of "baby lung"

Luciano Gattinoni et al. Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The "baby lung" concept originated as an offspring of computed tomography examinations which showed in most patients with acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome that the normally aerated tissue has the dimensions of the lung of a 5- to 6-year-old child (300-500 g aerated tissue).

Discussion: The respiratory system compliance is linearly related to the "baby lung" dimensions, suggesting that the acute respiratory distress syndrome lung is not "stiff" but instead small, with nearly normal intrinsic elasticity. Initially we taught that the "baby lung" is a distinct anatomical structure, in the nondependent lung regions. However, the density redistribution in prone position shows that the "baby lung" is a functional and not an anatomical concept. This provides a rational for "gentle lung treatment" and a background to explain concepts such as baro- and volutrauma.

Conclusions: From a physiological perspective the "baby lung" helps to understand ventilator-induced lung injury. In this context, what appears dangerous is not the V(T)/kg ratio but instead the V(T)/"baby lung" ratio. The practical message is straightforward: the smaller the "baby lung," the greater is the potential for unsafe mechanical ventilation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;161(6):2005-12 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1980 Aug 9;2(8189):292-4 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb;33(2):361-7 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1988 May;137(5):1159-64 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1981 Jan;48(1):121-7 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources