Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2003 Jul;91(3):322-36.

Benchmarking information needs and use in the Tennessee public health community

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Benchmarking information needs and use in the Tennessee public health community

Patricia Lee et al. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: The objective is to provide insight to understanding public health officials' needs and promote access to data repositories and communication tools.

Methods: Survey questions were identified by a focus group with members drawn from the fields of librarianship, public health, and informatics. The resulting comprehensive information needs survey, organized in five distinct broad categories, was distributed to 775 Tennessee public health workers from ninety-five counties in 1999 as part of the National Library of Medicine-funded Partners in Information Access contract.

Results: The assessment pooled responses from 571 public health workers (73% return rate) representing seventy-two of ninety-five counties (53.4% urban and 46.6% rural) about their information-seeking behaviors, frequency of resources used, computer skills, and level of Internet access. Sixty-four percent of urban and 43% of rural respondents had email access at work and more than 50% of both urban and rural respondents had email at home (N = 289). Approximately 70% of urban and 78% of rural public health officials never or seldom used or needed the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Website. Frequency data pooled from eleven job categories representing a subgroup of 232 health care professionals showed 72% never or seldom used or needed MEDLINE. Electronic resources used daily or weekly were email, Internet search engines, internal databases and mailing lists, and the Tennessee Department of Health Website.

Conclusions: While, due to the small sample size, data cannot be generalized to the larger population, a clear trend of significant barriers to computer and Internet access can be identified across the public health community. This contributes to an overall limited use of existing electronic resources that inhibits evidence-based practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Tennessee health regions
Figure 2
Figure 2
Educational distribution of respondents (N = 571)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Public health workers: years of experience
Figure 4
Figure 4
Self-ranking of computer expertise (N = 384)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yasnoff WA, O'Carroll PW, Koo D, Linkins RW, and Kilbourne EM. Public health informatics: improving and transforming public health in the Information Age. J Public Health Management Practice. 2000 Nov; 6(6):67–75. - PubMed
    1. Committee for the Study of the Future of Public Health, Division of Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine. The future of public health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.
    1. Lasker RD, Humphreys BL, and Braithwaite WR. Making a powerful connection: the health of the public and the national information infrastructure. Washington, DC: Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.
    1. Information for health: a strategy for building the national health information infrastructure. [Web document]. Washington, DC: The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, 15 Nov 2001. [cited 10 Feb 2003]. <http://ncvhs.hhs.gov/nhiilayo.pdf>.
    1. Yasnoff WA, Overhage JM, Humphreys BL, and LaVenture M. A national agenda for public health informatics: summarized recommendations from the 2001 AMIA Spring Congress. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2001 Nov–Dec; 8(6):535–45. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources