Role of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma
- PMID: 10950037
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02245.x
Role of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Abstract
Objective: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have both been assessed individually as staging modalities for pancreatic cancer. The aim of our study was to assess whether tumor staging by both EUS and MRI in the same cohort of patients could predict resectability and unresectability in patients with pancreatic cancer.
Methods: A review of 63 patients evaluated preoperatively with both EUS and MRI for pancreatic adenocarcinoma between January 1995 and December 1998 was done. Patients were staged as resectable or unresectable by predefined criteria. Preoperative staging by both modalities was compared to surgical outcome and the sensitivity and predictive values of each modality for determining resectability and unresectability was determined.
Results: EUS did not allow for complete T- and N-staging in 10 patients; therefore, for EUS, the final analysis was done on 63 of 73 patients (86%). EUS correctly staged 22 of 36 patients with resectable tumors. The sensitivity of EUS for resectability was 61%, with a positive predictive value of 69%. All 73 patients had complete MRI examinations; therefore, the final analysis was done on all 73 patients. MRI correctly staged 30 of 41 patients with resectable tumors. The sensitivity of MRI for predicting resectability was 73% with a positive predictive value of 77%. MRI and EUS both predicted resectability in 18 patients, of whom 16 (89%) were found to be resectable on surgical exploration. MRI and EUS both predicted unresectability in 17 (27%) patients, of whom 4 (24%) were found to be resectable on surgical exploration. When both MRI and EUS agreed on resectability, the positive predictive value for resectability was 89%. When both MRI and EUS agreed on unresectability, the positive predictive value for unresectability was 76%.
Conclusions: Neither MRI nor EUS alone were highly sensitive or predictive of resectability. However, when both tests agreed on resectability, nearly all patients were found to be resectable on surgical exploration.
Similar articles
-
EUS in preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer.Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Oct;52(4):463-8. doi: 10.1067/mge.2000.107725. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000. PMID: 11023561
-
Radial endoscopic ultrasonography in the preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer.J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008 Sep;17(3):273-8. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008. PMID: 18836619
-
Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography.Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Mar;99(3):492-501. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04087.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004. PMID: 15056091
-
Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Sep 15;9(9):CD011515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011515.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27631326 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Endoscopy in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer].Tumori. 1999 Jan-Feb;85(1 Suppl 1):S14-8. Tumori. 1999. PMID: 10235074 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Controversies in the management of borderline resectable proximal pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement.HPB Surg. 2008;2008:839503. doi: 10.1155/2008/839503. Epub 2009 Mar 11. HPB Surg. 2008. PMID: 19283083 Free PMC article.
-
Applications of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 28;20(24):7808-18. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i24.7808. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24976719 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endoscopic ultrasonography.J Gastrointest Surg. 2002 Mar-Apr;6(2):129-32. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00056-7. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002. PMID: 11992795 Review. No abstract available.
-
Evaluating comparative effectiveness with observational data: endoscopic ultrasound and survival in pancreatic cancer.Cancer. 2013 Nov 1;119(21):3861-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28295. Epub 2013 Aug 6. Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23922148 Free PMC article.
-
Neoadjuvant strategies for pancreatic cancer.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jul 28;20(28):9374-83. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i28.9374. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25071332 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical