* Backfill population in island areas (#1882)
* Update smoketest to account for backfills (#1882)
As I wrote in the commend:
We backfill island areas with data from the 2010 census, so if THOSE tracts
have data beyond the data source, that's to be expected and is fine to pass.
If some other state or territory does though, this should fail
This ends up being a nice way of documenting that behavior i guess!
* Fixup lint issues (#1882)
* Add in race demos to 2010 census pull (#1851)
* Add backfill data to score (#1851)
* Change column name (#1851)
* Fill demos after the score (#1851)
* Add income back, adjust test (#1882)
* Apply code-review feedback (#1851)
* Add test for island area backfill (#1851)
* Fix bad rename (#1851)
* Add notebook to generate test data (#1780)
* Add Abandoned Mine Land data (#1780)
Using a similar structure but simpler apporach compared to FUDs, add an
indicator for whether a tract has an abandonded mine.
* Adding some detail to dataset readmes
Just a thought!
* Apply feedback from revieiw (#1780)
* Fixup bad string that broke test (#1780)
* Update a string that I should have renamed (#1780)
* Reduce number of threads to reduce memory pressure (#1780)
* Try not running geo data (#1780)
* Run the high-memory sets separately (#1780)
* Actually deduplicate (#1780)
* Add flag for memory intensive ETLs (#1780)
* Document new flag for datasets (#1780)
* Add flag for new datasets fro rebase (#1780)
Co-authored-by: Emma Nechamkin <97977170+emma-nechamkin@users.noreply.github.com>
