Grandfathered tracts have different color

This commit is contained in:
Carlos Felix 2024-12-27 11:37:51 -05:00 committed by Carlos Felix
commit 739c6f9306
9 changed files with 76 additions and 12 deletions

View file

@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ exports[`rendering of the DatasetContainer checks if various text fields are vis
id="faq-id-5"
>
<p>
Some census tracts that contain land within the boundaries of Federally Recognized Tribes are also considered disadvantaged because they meet the burden thresholds for at least one of the categories on the tool. When this happens, the areas appear darker on the tools map.
Different areas of the map will have different colors because they are identified as disadvantaged in different ways. Some census tracts that contain land within the boundaries of Federally Recognized Tribes are also considered disadvantaged because they meet the burden thresholds for at least one of the categories on the tool. When this happens, the areas appear darker on the tools map.
</p>
<div
style="display: flex;"
@ -707,6 +707,23 @@ exports[`rendering of the DatasetContainer checks if various text fields are vis
</div>
</div>
<div
style="display: flex;"
>
<img
alt="
a blue circle icon informing the user of what a disadvantaged community is depicted as
"
src="test-file-stub"
style="align-self: baseline; padding-top: 5px;"
/>
<div
style="padding-left: 2px;"
>
: Disadvantaged census tracts (grandfathered)
</div>
</div>
<p>
Any area that is highlighted is considered disadvantaged, regardless of whether it is a light shade or dark shade. The tool will show if a whole census tract is considered disadvantaged or just the parts that contain land within the boundaries of Federally Recognized Tribes.
</p>