Revert "Fast flag update (#1844)"

This reverts commit d892bce6cf.
This commit is contained in:
Emma Nechamkin 2022-08-19 14:05:45 -04:00 committed by GitHub
parent d892bce6cf
commit 5c41c95764
14 changed files with 31 additions and 63 deletions

View file

@ -21,14 +21,17 @@ fields:
label: Total categories exceeded
format: int64
- score_name: Definition N (communities)
label: Identified as disadvantaged without considering neighbors
format: bool
- score_name: Definition N (communities) (based on adjacency index and low income alone)
label: Identified as disadvantaged based on neighbors and relaxed low income threshold only
format: bool
- score_name: Definition M community, including adjacency index tracts
label: Identified as disadvantaged
format: bool
- score_name: Definition N (communities) (including adjacency index)
label: Identified as disadvantaged (including adjacency index)
format: bool
- score_name: Is the tract surrounded by disadvantaged communities?
label: Is the tract surrounded by disadvantaged communities?
format: bool
- score_name: Meets the less stringent low income criterion for the adjacency index?
label: Meets the less stringent low income criterion for the adjacency index?
format: bool
- score_name: Definition N (communities) (average of neighbors)
label: Share of neighbors that are identified as disadvantaged
format: percentage
@ -338,6 +341,3 @@ fields:
- score_name: Tract-level redlining score meets or exceeds 3.25
label: Tract experienced historic underinvestment
format: bool
- score_name: Income data has been estimated based on neighbor income
label: Income data has been estimated based on geographic neighbor income
format: bool

View file

@ -25,14 +25,17 @@ sheets:
label: Total categories exceeded
format: int64
- score_name: Definition N (communities)
label: Identified as disadvantaged without considering neighbors
format: bool
- score_name: Definition N (communities) (based on adjacency index and low income alone)
label: Identified as disadvantaged based on neighbors and relaxed low income threshold only
format: bool
- score_name: Definition M community, including adjacency index tracts
label: Identified as disadvantaged
format: bool
- score_name: Definition N (communities) (including adjacency index)
label: Identified as disadvantaged (including adjacency index)
format: bool
- score_name: Is the tract surrounded by disadvantaged communities?
label: Is the tract surrounded by disadvantaged communities?
format: bool
- score_name: Meets the less stringent low income criterion for the adjacency index?
label: Meets the less stringent low income criterion for the adjacency index?
format: bool
- score_name: Definition N (communities) (average of neighbors)
label: Share of neighbors that are identified as disadvantaged
format: percentage
@ -342,6 +345,3 @@ sheets:
- score_name: Tract-level redlining score meets or exceeds 3.25
label: Tract experienced historic underinvestment
format: bool
- score_name: Income data has been estimated based on neighbor income
label: Income data has been estimated based on geographic neighbor income
format: bool

View file

@ -208,10 +208,9 @@ TILES_SCORE_COLUMNS = {
field_names.M_HEALTH: "M_HLTH",
# temporarily update this so that it's the Narwhal score that gets visualized on the map
# The NEW final score value INCLUDES the adjacency index.
field_names.FINAL_SCORE_N_BOOLEAN: "SM_C",
field_names.SCORE_N_COMMUNITIES + field_names.ADJACENT_MEAN_SUFFIX: "SM_C",
field_names.SCORE_N_COMMUNITIES
+ field_names.ADJACENT_MEAN_SUFFIX: "SM_DON",
field_names.SCORE_N_COMMUNITIES: "SM_NO_DON",
+ field_names.PERCENTILE_FIELD_SUFFIX: "SM_PFS",
field_names.EXPECTED_POPULATION_LOSS_RATE_LOW_INCOME_LOW_HIGHER_ED_FIELD: "EPLRLI",
field_names.EXPECTED_AGRICULTURE_LOSS_RATE_LOW_INCOME_LOW_HIGHER_ED_FIELD: "EALRLI",
field_names.EXPECTED_BUILDING_LOSS_RATE_LOW_INCOME_LOW_HIGHER_ED_FIELD: "EBLRLI",
@ -314,8 +313,7 @@ TILES_SCORE_COLUMNS = {
+ field_names.PERCENTILE_FIELD_SUFFIX: "IS_PFS",
field_names.NON_NATURAL_LOW_INCOME_FIELD_NAME: "IS_ET",
field_names.AML_BOOLEAN: "AML_ET",
field_names.ELIGIBLE_FUDS_BINARY_FIELD_NAME: "FUDS_ET",
field_names.IMPUTED_INCOME_FLAG_FIELD_NAME: "IMP_FLG"
field_names.ELIGIBLE_FUDS_BINARY_FIELD_NAME: "FUDS_ET"
## FPL 200 and low higher ed for all others should no longer be M_EBSI, but rather
## FPL_200 (there is no higher ed in narwhal)
}

View file

@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ class ScoreETL(ExtractTransformLoad):
field_names.AGRICULTURAL_VALUE_BOOL_FIELD,
field_names.ELIGIBLE_FUDS_BINARY_FIELD_NAME,
field_names.AML_BOOLEAN,
field_names.IMPUTED_INCOME_FLAG_FIELD_NAME,
]
# For some columns, high values are "good", so we want to reverse the percentile

View file

@ -521,6 +521,8 @@ class PostScoreETL(ExtractTransformLoad):
score_tiles_df.to_csv(tile_score_path, index=False, encoding="utf-8")
def _load_downloadable_zip(self, downloadable_info_path: Path) -> None:
logger.info("Saving Downloadable CSV")
downloadable_info_path.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
csv_path = constants.SCORE_DOWNLOADABLE_CSV_FILE_PATH
excel_path = constants.SCORE_DOWNLOADABLE_EXCEL_FILE_PATH

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

View file

@ -227,7 +227,6 @@ class CensusACSETL(ExtractTransformLoad):
self.COLLEGE_ATTENDANCE_FIELD,
self.COLLEGE_NON_ATTENDANCE_FIELD,
self.IMPUTED_COLLEGE_ATTENDANCE_FIELD,
field_names.IMPUTED_INCOME_FLAG_FIELD_NAME,
]
+ self.RE_OUTPUT_FIELDS
+ [self.PERCENT_PREFIX + field for field in self.RE_OUTPUT_FIELDS]
@ -504,13 +503,6 @@ class CensusACSETL(ExtractTransformLoad):
}
)
# We generate a boolean that is TRUE when there is an imputed income but not a baseline income, and FALSE otherwise.
# This allows us to see which tracts have an imputed income.
df[field_names.IMPUTED_INCOME_FLAG_FIELD_NAME] = (
df[field_names.POVERTY_LESS_THAN_200_FPL_IMPUTED_FIELD].notna()
& df[field_names.POVERTY_LESS_THAN_200_FPL_FIELD].isna()
)
# Strip columns and save results to self.
self.df = df[self.COLUMNS_TO_KEEP]

View file

@ -92,17 +92,12 @@ def calculate_income_measures(
)
# Iterate through the dataframe to impute in place
## TODO: We should probably convert this to a spatial join now that we are doing >1 imputation and it's taking a lot
## of time, but thinking through how to do this while maintaining the masking will take some time. I think the best
## way would be to (1) spatial join to all neighbors, and then (2) iterate to take the "smallest" set of neighbors...
## but haven't implemented it yet.
for index, row in geo_df.iterrows():
if row[geoid_field] in tract_list:
neighbor_mask = _get_neighbor_mask(geo_df, row)
county_mask = _get_fips_mask(
geo_df=geo_df, row=row, fips_digits=5, geoid_field=geoid_field
)
## TODO: Did CEQ decide to cut this?
state_mask = _get_fips_mask(
geo_df=geo_df, row=row, fips_digits=2, geoid_field=geoid_field
)

View file

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
# Suffixes
PERCENTILE_FIELD_SUFFIX = " (percentile)"
ISLAND_AREAS_PERCENTILE_ADJUSTMENT_FIELD = " for island areas"
ADJACENT_MEAN_SUFFIX = " (based on adjacency index and low income alone)"
ADJACENT_MEAN_SUFFIX = " (including adjacency index)"
ADJACENCY_INDEX_SUFFIX = " (average of neighbors)"
# Geographic field names
@ -12,9 +12,6 @@ COUNTY_FIELD = "County Name"
# Score file field names
# Definition M fields
SCORE_M = "Definition M"
FINAL_SCORE_N_BOOLEAN = (
"Definition M community, including adjacency index tracts"
)
SCORE_M_COMMUNITIES = "Definition M (communities)"
M_CLIMATE = "Climate Factor (Definition M)"
M_ENERGY = "Energy Factor (Definition M)"
@ -70,9 +67,6 @@ ADJUSTED_POVERTY_LESS_THAN_200_PERCENT_FPL_FIELD_NAME = (
# this is what gets used in the score
POVERTY_LESS_THAN_200_FPL_IMPUTED_FIELD = "Percent of individuals below 200% Federal Poverty Line, imputed and adjusted"
IMPUTED_INCOME_FLAG_FIELD_NAME = (
"Income data has been estimated based on neighbor income"
)
POVERTY_LESS_THAN_150_FPL_FIELD = (
"Percent of individuals < 150% Federal Poverty Line"
)

View file

@ -385,10 +385,8 @@ class ScoreNarwhal(Score):
# Kitchen / plumbing
self.df[field_names.NO_KITCHEN_OR_INDOOR_PLUMBING_PCTILE_THRESHOLD] = (
self.df[
field_names.NO_KITCHEN_OR_INDOOR_PLUMBING_FIELD
+ field_names.PERCENTILE_FIELD_SUFFIX
]
self.df[field_names.NO_KITCHEN_OR_INDOOR_PLUMBING_FIELD
+ field_names.PERCENTILE_FIELD_SUFFIX]
>= self.ENVIRONMENTAL_BURDEN_THRESHOLD
)
@ -973,8 +971,8 @@ class ScoreNarwhal(Score):
>= self.SCORE_THRESHOLD_DONUT
)
# This constructs the boolean for whether it's a donut hole community
# This can also be true when the tract itself is a DAC on its own
# This should be the "final list" of Score Narwhal communities, meaning that we would
# expect this to be True if either the tract is a donut hole community OR the tract is a DAC
self.df[
field_names.SCORE_N_COMMUNITIES + field_names.ADJACENT_MEAN_SUFFIX
] = (
@ -982,16 +980,6 @@ class ScoreNarwhal(Score):
& self.df[field_names.ADJACENT_TRACT_SCORE_ABOVE_DONUT_THRESHOLD]
)
# This should be the "final list" of Score Narwhal communities, meaning that we would
# expect this to be True if either the tract is a donut hole community OR the tract is a DAC
self.df[field_names.FINAL_SCORE_N_BOOLEAN] = (
self.df[field_names.SCORE_N_COMMUNITIES]
| self.df[
field_names.SCORE_N_COMMUNITIES
+ field_names.ADJACENT_MEAN_SUFFIX
]
)
def add_columns(self) -> pd.DataFrame:
logger.info("Adding Score Narhwal")