publicdata/ahrq-gov
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
ahrq-gov/archive.ahrq.gov/research/oct97/ra3.htm
Scott Williams 58222b51ed Initial commit
2025-02-28 14:14:25 -05:00

384 lines
No EOL
27 KiB
HTML
Raw Blame History

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Research Activities, October 1997: Preventive Health/Chronic Conditions; Medical Informatics; Special Populations</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
<!-- "metadata" -->
<meta name="Title" content="Research Activities, October 1997" />
<meta name="keywords" content="Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, AHRQ, AHCPR, AIDS/HIV, ambulatory care, benchmark, child, cost, elderly, health cost, healthcare cost, hospital, long-term care, managed care, markets, mental health, methodology, minority health, nursing, nursing homes, outcome research, out-of-pocket spending, patient care, primary, primary care, research, rural, spending, study, Translating Research Into Practice, TRIP" />
<meta name="description" content="Online newsletter summarizing published findings from AHRQ-funded studies, new AHRQ publications and products, and funding opportunities." />
<meta name="creator" content="Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)" />
<meta name="language" content="English" />
<!-- end metadata -->
<link href="/includes/archive.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link href="/includes/ahrqstyleprint_arch.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="print" />
<script>
(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){
(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),
m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)
})(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga');
ga('create', 'UA-75759936-1', 'auto');
ga(' set', 'anonymizeIp', true);
ga('send', 'pageview');
</script></head><body><!-- Google Tag Manager -->
<noscript><iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-W4DST4"
height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden"></iframe></noscript>
<script>(function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':
new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],
j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src=
'//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);
})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-W4DST4');</script>
<!-- End Google Tag Manager -->
<noscript>
Your browser doesn't support JavaScript. Please upgrade to a modern browser or enable JavaScript in your existing browser.
</noscript>
<!-- Page Header v2.0 -->
<a name="top" id="top"></a>
<!--Begin Banner CodeS-->
<div id="ahrqbanner">
<div class="hhsportion">
<a href="#h1" class="skipnav">Skip Navigation</a>
<a href="http://www.hhs.gov" title="U.S. Department of Health and Human Services">
<img src="/images/hhs_banner.gif" alt="U.S. Department of Health and Human Services" />
</a>
<a href="http://www.hhs.gov" title="www.hhs.gov" class="hhsright">
<img src="/images/hhs_link.gif" alt="www.hhs.gov" />
</a>
</div>
<div class="ahrqportion">
<a href="/" title="Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality">
<img src="/images/ahrq_banner.gif" alt="Agency for Healthcare Research Quality" />
</a><form name="searchForm" method="get" action="https://search.ahrq.gov/search" id="banner_searchform">
<label for="search" style="z-index:-1;position:relative;margin-right:-65px; font-size:0px;">Search</label>
<input name="q" type="text" value=" Search Archive" size="11" onfocus="this.value='';" class="gotext" label="Search archive" id="search" />
<input type="hidden" name="entqr" value="0" />
<input type="hidden" name="output" value="xml_no_dtd" />
<input type="hidden" name="proxystylesheet" value="ARCHIVE_Front_End" />
<input type="hidden" name="client" value="ARCHIVE_Front_End" />
<input type="hidden" name="site" value="ARCHIVE_AHRQ_GOV" />
<input src="/images/topbn_GoButton.gif" class="gobtn" name="Submit" onclick="javascript:document.searchForm.submit();" type="image" alt="Search" />
</form>
<a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/" class="ahrqright">www.ahrq.gov</a>
</div><div class="ahrqlinks"><a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/">AHRQ Home&#8212;Live Site</a> | <a href="/">Archive Home</a> | <a href="/sitemap.htm">Site Map</a> <!-- | &nbsp;<img src="/images/envelope1.jpg" alt="" width="21" height="14" /><a href="https://subscriptions.ahrq.gov/service/multi_subscribe.html?code=USAHRQ">E-mail Updates</a> --></div>
</div>
<div id="PrintBanner">
<img src="/images/printbanner_arch.jpg" alt="Archive print banner" />
</div>
<a name="h1"></a>
<!-- End banner code -->
<!-- End of Page header -->
<!-- Content Body -->
<div id="mainContent">
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" >
<tr valign="top">
<td width="70%">
<!-- Center Content section -->
<table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="margin-left:10px; margin-right:10px;margin-top:5px" summary="This table gives the layout format of the bread crumb area and the center content area.">
<!--DWLayoutTable-->
<tr>
<td class="crumb_link"><div id="crumbContent">
<p><strong>You Are Here:</strong> <span class="crumb_link"><a href="/" class="crumb_link">AHRQ Archive Home</a> &gt; <a href="/research/resarch.htm" class="crumb_link"><em>Research Activities</em> Archive</a> &gt; <a href="." class="crumb_link">October 1997</a>
</span></p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><h1><a name="h1" id="h1"></a> Preventive Health/Chronic Conditions </h1>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><div id="centerContent"><div class="headnote">
<p>This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: <a href="https://info.ahrq.gov/">https://info.ahrq.gov</a>. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information. </p>
<p>Please go to <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/">www.ahrq.gov</a> for current information.</p></div>
<a name="head1"></a>
<a name="head2"></a><h2>Screening more people for cancer may mean less
frequent screening for certain cancers</h2>
<p>Screening more persons for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers is a year 2000 goal of the
United States. But meeting this goal means a tradeoff in terms of money and resources spent.
Less frequent screening among the currently screened population would be necessary in order to
increase the overall number of individuals screened. For colon and cervical cancer, this makes
sense, but not for breast cancer, concludes this analysis by Graham A. Colditz, M.D., and his
colleagues at Harvard University. In a study supported in part by the Agency for Health Care
Policy and Research (HS07038), they examined criteria currently used to evaluate the
effectiveness of screening for cancer.</p><p>
Screening for cervical and colon cancer is meant to disclose precancerous lesions. The interval
from a negative screening test to a subsequent new cancer is certainly longer than the interval
between a negative mammogram for breast cancer and a later mammogram because this screening
is for malignancies. Screening programs for cervical cancer are so effective that annual and
biennial screens are unnecessary for women at average risk, in part because progression from the
detectable, precancerous state to cancer is slow. Reallocating resources away from annual Pap
smears should be an explicit public health policy, as should the emphasis on expanding coverage
in the unscreened population, recommend the researchers.</p>
<p>Similarly, fecal occult blood testing or flexible sigmoidoscopy, recommended either annually by
some to every 3 to 5 years by others, aims to detect cancer at an early stage or to detect and
remove colon polyps, which are precursor lesions that over time will progress to colon cancer if
left untreated. Screening less frequently but screening more of the population will result in fewer
cases of cancer and fewer deaths, according to the researchers. On the other hand, mammography
is moderately effective in decreasing breast cancer deaths among women aged 50 and older. When
to start screening women and how often to screen are still being debated. But because the benefit
from having a mammogram substantially dissipates beyond 2 years, the researchers do not
propose any decrease in screening frequency for women already screened in order to increase the
number of women screened. Yet expanded population coverage is needed to detect breast cancer,
as only 48 percent of women have had a mammogram in the last 3 years. </p><p>
Details are in "Cancer incidence and mortality: The priority of screening frequency and population
coverage," by Dr. Colditz, David C. Hoaglin, Ph.D., and Catherine S. Berkey, D.Sc., in<em> The
Milbank Quarterly</em> 75 (2), pp. 147-173, 1997. </p>
<a name="head3"></a><h2>Improvements are needed in the provision of
preventive health services</h2>
<p>Despite the establishment of rather modest national goals to deliver preventive care services and
guidelines that recommend specific screening tests, current rates of many preventive services
could be substantially improved. The following two studies, led by Leif I. Solberg, M.D., of the
Group Health Foundation and supported by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
(HS08091), examine factors affecting the provision of preventive services.</p> <p>
The first study suggests that the positive attitudes of physicians and nurses about providing
preventive care do not affect actual provision of these services. The second study shows that
physicians recommend preventive services at the same rate for all patients, regardless of income
or insurance status. Yet, poor patients are 20 to 30 percent less likely to be up to date on
vaccinations and most screening tests. </p>
<p><strong>Solberg, L.I., Brekke, M.L., and Kottke, T.E. (1997, May). "How important are clinician
and nurse attitudes to the delivery of clinical preventive services?" <em>Journal of Family
Practice</em> 44(5), pp. 451-461.</strong></p><p>
There is little association between provider attitudes about preventive health services and the rate
at which these services are provided, according to the findings of this study. Despite providers
favorable attitudes toward providing preventive services, only 6 to 29 percent of patients needing
particular preventive services, such as mammograms or vaccinations, received recommendations
for them during an office visit. The exceptions were blood pressure measurements&#8212;nearly
always
part of every doctor's visit&#8212;and stop-smoking advice. Changing clinician attitudes may not
be the
key to improving delivery of preventive health services, conclude the researchers. They suggest
instead that the focus should be on altering the environmental barriers which interfere with
providing preventive services, such as building supportive office systems.</p>
<p>The researchers surveyed 647 clinic physicians, midlevel practitioners, and nurses in 44 primary
care clinics contracting with health maintenance organizations about their attitudes toward
preventive care. They also surveyed 6,830 patients visiting the clinics about their receipt of eight
specific preventive care services: Pap smears, mammograms, breast exams, hypertension
screening, cholesterol screening, stop-smoking advice, influenza shots, and pneumonia shots.</p>
<p>Most providers believed that preventive services were an important component of their practices
and were willing to work on improving these services. They also supported the use of teams to
work on problems or devise systematic ways to remind providers of the preventive services
needed by individual patients. Despite these favorable attitudes, few patients were offered
cholesterol measurement (7 percent), a breast exam (15 percent), mammogram (24 percent), Pap
test (29 percent), influenza immunization (26 percent), or pneumonia immunization (6 percent),
although 48 percent were advised to quit smoking.</p>
<p><strong>Solberg, L.I., Brekke, M.L., and Kottke, T.E. (1997, May). "Are physicians less likely to
recommend preventive services to low-SES patients?" <em>Preventive Medicine</em> 26, pp.
350-357.</strong></p> <p>
According to this study, primary care physicians at 22 clinics that contract with health
maintenance organizations recommend preventive screening tests and services at the same rate for
all patients, regardless of their income or insurance status. Yet, with the exception of blood
pressure readings, low-socioeconomic-status (SES) patients are substantially less likely to be up
to date on immunizations and screening tests than other patients. This is despite the patients'
similar interest in receiving these services, note the researchers. They based their findings on a
survey of 4,245 patients (39.7 percent low-SES patients) within 2 weeks of a visit to one of the
study clinics. </p>
<p>Results showed that all the preventive services needed by clinic patients were recommended at
essentially the same rates, regardless of their SES. In fact, low-SES patients reported more
queries about whether they smoked and advice about quitting smoking than other patients.
Nevertheless, low-SES patients had 20 percent lower mean clinic rates for cholesterol testing
within 5 years than other patients; 26 percent had lower rates for a breast exam within 2 years, a
flu shot in the past year, or ever having had a pneumonia shot; and 9 percent had lower rates for a
Pap smear within 2 years. If these differences are not due to differential efforts by physicians to
encourage patients to obtain these services or to actually perform them, the researchers are
puzzled about what might account for the differences.</p>
<a name="head4"></a><h2>Age, weight, and back injury influence the likelihood
of chronic back disability</h2>
<p>The number of persons with disabling low-back pain has increased dramatically in recent years,
with about 5 percent of the U.S. population now affected. If you are older than 34 years,
overweight, and have a history of back trauma, you are more likely to have chronic back
disability, says a new study.</p> <p>
Using data from the 1989 National Health Interview Survey, the researchers correlated back
problems in a representative sample of the adult population of the United States. Workers who
were aged 35 to 54, had not graduated from high school, had disabling non-back medical
problems, and had weight above the 50th percentile, were relatively more likely than others to
have a disabling back condition. Those in technical, sales, clerical, private household, service,
precision production and repair, and transportation occupations were more prone to this problem
than professional workers. However, occupation was not correlated with nondisabling back
conditions.</p>
<p>Both acutely disabled (at least one back-related restricted activity day in the preceding 2 weeks)
and chronically disabled persons tended to be male, minority, less educated, never married, and
unemployed. Age over 34 years, weight above the 50th percentile, and history of back trauma
correlated only with chronic back disability. People working in truck driving, nursing, mining,
customer service, construction, mechanics, and retail sales may have a high prevalence of
disabling back problems because they are exposed to specific physical/work activities that increase
their risk for back pain and subsequent disability. These include lifting, twisting, lifting while
twisting, sitting, standing, driving, pulling, pushing, carrying, lowering, bending, stretching and
reaching, and exposure to vibration.</p><p>
While other studies have shown that various factors predict chronic back pain, this is the first
study to compare predictors of long-term chronic and acute back disability, note Eric L. Hurwitz,
D.C., Ph.D., and Hal Morgenstern, Ph.D., of the University of California, Los Angeles School of
Public Health. Their work was supported by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
(HS07968).</p>
<p>For more details, see "Correlates of back problems and back-related disability in the United
States," by Drs. Hurwitz and Morgenstern, in the <em>Journal of Clinical Epidemiology</em> 50(6),
pp.
669-681, 1997.</p>
<p class="size2"><a href=".">Return to Contents</a></p>
<a name="head5"></a><h1>Medical Informatics</h1>
<a name="head6"></a><h2>Patient confidentiality must be safeguarded before
life-saving information can be transmitted via the
Internet</h2>
<p>Emergency physicians treating an unconscious patient need to know whether the patient has
allergies to certain medications, has any chronic health problems, or is currently taking
medication. But these facts, which can be critical to saving a person's life, are difficult to obtain
without quick access to a patient's full medical record. The Boston Electronic Medical Record
Collaborative is working to solve this problem. It has developed the Word Wide Web Electronic
Medical Record System (W3-EMRS) that will use the Internet and the World Wide Web to
transfer hospitals' computer-based patient information to the emergency departments (EDs) of
participating institutions.</p> <p>
With support from a cooperative agreement between the Agency for Health Care Policy and
Research (HS08749) and the National Library of Medicine (LM05877), Charles Safran, M.D.,
F.A.C.P., of Harvard Medical School, and his colleagues recently proposed a system to maintain
the confidentiality and security of patient information in an online system such as the W3-EMRS.
Advances in Internet and Web security needed for financial transactions will be adequate to
protect patient information during the transmission process, according to lead author David M.
Rind, M.D., of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. The most common threat to
confidentiality is the inappropriate accessing of information by authorized providers. </p>
<p>The proposed protocol for the protection of confidentiality addresses a single important
scenario&#8212;the treatment of a patient in the ED&#8212;in which patient care would be
improved through the
interinstitutional transfer of records. In the absence of exceptional circumstances, explicit patient
consent must be obtained but would not be needed in serious medical situations where the
doctrine of implied consent would apply if the patient were incapable of communicating consent.
Both the patient's and the provider's identities must be authenticated, including a secure password
by provider institutions. Patient consent must be verified, emergency need for access must be
confirmed, integrity of data of the medical record must be maintained, and the patient has the right
to review any data released. Clinicians who request information are required to have a hardware
device that generates a time-limited password, so that breaches in confidentiality can be identified
and rectified. </p> <p>
Details are in "Maintaining the confidentiality of medical records shared over the Internet and the
World Wide Web," by Dr. Rind, Isaac S. Kohane, M.D., Ph.D., Peter Szolovits, Ph.D., and
others, in the July 15, 1997, <em>Annals of Internal Medicine</em> 127, pp. 138-141. </p>
<a name="head7"></a><h2>Barriers continue to hinder integration of medical
technology into home health care</h2>
<p>In 1995, home health care expenditures soared over $2 billion but still accounted for only 3
percent of total U.S. spending on health care. Medical technology, including teleconsulting and
teleradiology, can substantially enhance access to and delivery of home health care services. For
instance, electronic home visits can improve the timeliness of medical interventions. But much has
to be resolved before medical technology can be integrated into home health care, comments
Diane L. Adams, M.D., M.P.H., of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, in a recent
article.</p><p>
Numerous industry and technical design issues have hindered the proliferation of and ability to
deliver telemedicine applications into the mainstream of home health care. The lethargy with
which telemedicine has been adopted is more indicative of historic business practices and
restrictions within the health care industry than any technology limitations imposed on it,
according to Dr. Adams. These barriers include variable, outdated, and often excessive
long-distance telecommunication rates; concerns about liability; licensure of physicians and other
providers within specific States when telemedicine may cross State lines; software and hardware
incompatibility; absence of minimal standards for the practice of telemedicine; and the lack of
reimbursement for telemedicine in most areas. </p>
<p>The author points out that several issues and their resolution will guide the progress of
telecommunications in health care. These include the management of fiscal and political risks by
Federal and State governments, public policy, and training of professionals to exploit the
technology once it is deemed fiscally viable. Although telemedicine's original mandate was to
improve access to health care in rural areas, it has now evolved to target the entire population. A current project involving the U.S. Department of Defense is focusing on developing an electronic
house call system that integrates into home televisions. </p> <p>
For more information, see "Home healthcare: A new venue for telemedicine," by Dr. Adams,
Kenneth L. Seymens, Gloria Rookard, R.N., P.N.P., and Brenda A. Leath, M.H.S.A., in
<em>World Medical Technology Update, 1997/1998</em>, edited by Brian Kellock, London: Kensington
Publications, Ltd., pp. 226-228, 1997. Reprints (AHCPR Publication No. 97-R088) are available
from the <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/research/publications/order/order-research-activities.html">AHCPR Publications Clearinghouse</a>.</p>
<p class="size2"><a href=".">Return to Contents</a></p>
<a name="head8"></a><h1>Special Populations</h1>
<a name="head9"></a><h2>Stressful life events linked with use of drugs, alcohol,
and cigarettes by poor women during pregnancy</h2>
<p>About 7 percent of poor black and Hispanic women who receive prenatal care at community
clinics continue to use drugs during pregnancy, which is comparable to national estimates (5.5
percent to 11 percent). Black women are much more apt to use substances during pregnancy than
Hispanic women, but stress and anxiety, not ethnicity, are highly associated with substance use
during pregnancy, according to a recent study supported by the Agency for Health Care Policy
and Research (HS05518). It found that women who continued to use substances during
pregnancy, regardless of ethnicity, experienced twice as many stressful life events as women who
did not use substances.</p><p>
Ruth E. Zambrana, Ph.D., of George Mason University, and Susan C.M. Scrimshaw, Ph.D., of
the University of Chicago, prospectively studied low-income, black (255), Mexican-American
(525), and Mexican-immigrant (764) women visiting 22 prenatal care clinics in Los Angeles. They
interviewed the women about prenatal life events, anxiety, sources of support, and their use of
substances in the 3 months before they became pregnant and during pregnancy. Black women
were more likely than Mexican-American or Mexican-immigrant women to be heavy users of
alcohol (5.5 percent compared with 1.7 percent and .7 percent, respectively); to have used drugs
(23.2 percent vs. 7.6 percent and 1.2 percent, respectively); and to have smoked cigarettes (34.6
percent vs. 27.8 percent and 18.8 percent, respectively). </p>
<p>Black women were the least likely to be employed full time or to live with the baby's father, and
they were most likely to receive public health insurance. They also reported more stressful life
events, such as death or injury of someone close, problems with alcohol and drugs, problems at
work, an arrest, or problems with government agencies; more distress from these events; and
higher anxiety than Hispanic women. These findings confirm other study results that link multiple
prenatal risk factors to women who use substances during pregnancy.</p> <p>
See "Maternal psychosocial factors associated with substance use in Mexican-origin and
African-American low-income pregnant women," by Drs. Zambrana and Scrimshaw, in the
May/June 1997 <em>Pediatric Nursing</em> 23(3), pp. 253-259, 274. </p>
<p class="size2"><a href=".">Return to Contents</a><br />
<a href="ra4.htm">Proceed to Next Section</a></p>
<div class="footnote">
<p> The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<!-- End of Center Content section -->
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<!-- End of Content Body -->
<!-- Footer graphic 1.2-->
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td width="125" background="/images/bottom_ahrq_bkg.jpg"><img src="/images/bottom_ahrq_1.jpg" width="125" alt="AHRQ" /></td>
<td width="100%" background="/images/bottom_ahrq_bkg.jpg" ><img src="/images/bottom_ahrq_bkg.jpg" width="10" height="34" alt="" /></td>
<td width="310" background="/images/bottom_ahrq_bkg.jpg"><img src="/images/bottom_ahrq_2.gif" alt="Advancing Excellence in Health Care" width="310" height="34" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!-- Footer links section -->
<div id="banner_Footer2"><p> <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/">AHRQ Home</a> | <a href="https://info.ahrq.gov" class="footer_navlink">Questions?</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/contact/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Contact AHRQ</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/sitemap.html" class="footer_navlink">Site Map</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/policy/electronic/accessibility/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Accessibility</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/policy/electronic/privacy/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Privacy
Policy</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/policy/foia/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Freedom of Information Act</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/policy/electronic/disclaimers/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Disclaimers</a> | <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/open/recordsandreports/plainwritingact/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Plain Writing Act</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.hhs.gov" class="footer_navlink">U.S. Department of Health &amp; Human Services</a> | <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov" class="footer_navlink">The White House</a> | <a href="http://www.usa.gov" class="footer_navlink">USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web Portal</a></p>
</div>
<div id="banner_Footeraddress"><p>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality <img src="/images/bottom_dot.gif" alt="" /> 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 <img src="/images/bottom_dot.gif" alt="" /> Telephone: (301) 427-1364</p></div>
<!-- End of Footer links section -->
</body>
</html>
Reference in a new issue View git blame Copy permalink