ahrq-gov/archive.ahrq.gov/hcqual/prepub/recommen.htm
2025-02-28 14:14:25 -05:00

649 lines
45 KiB
HTML

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<title>Quality First Report (Pre-published version): Health Care Quality Commission</title><link href="/includes/archive.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<link href="/includes/ahrqstyleprint_arch.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="print" />
<script>
(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){i['GoogleAnalyticsObject']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){
(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),
m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)
})(window,document,'script','//www.google-analytics.com/analytics.js','ga');
ga('create', 'UA-75759936-1', 'auto');
ga(' set', 'anonymizeIp', true);
ga('send', 'pageview');
</script></head>
<body><!-- Google Tag Manager -->
<noscript><iframe src="//www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-W4DST4"
height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden"></iframe></noscript>
<script>(function(w,d,s,l,i){w[l]=w[l]||[];w[l].push({'gtm.start':
new Date().getTime(),event:'gtm.js'});var f=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],
j=d.createElement(s),dl=l!='dataLayer'?'&l='+l:'';j.async=true;j.src=
'//www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id='+i+dl;f.parentNode.insertBefore(j,f);
})(window,document,'script','dataLayer','GTM-W4DST4');</script>
<!-- End Google Tag Manager -->
<noscript>
Your browser doesn't support JavaScript. Please upgrade to a modern browser or enable JavaScript in your existing browser.
</noscript>
<!-- Page Header v2.0 -->
<a name="top" id="top"></a>
<!--Begin Banner CodeS-->
<div id="ahrqbanner">
<div class="hhsportion">
<a href="#h1" class="skipnav">Skip Navigation</a>
<a href="http://www.hhs.gov" title="U.S. Department of Health and Human Services">
<img src="/images/hhs_banner.gif" alt="U.S. Department of Health and Human Services" />
</a>
<a href="http://www.hhs.gov" title="www.hhs.gov" class="hhsright">
<img src="/images/hhs_link.gif" alt="www.hhs.gov" />
</a>
</div>
<div class="ahrqportion">
<a href="/" title="Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality">
<img src="/images/ahrq_banner.gif" alt="Agency for Healthcare Research Quality" />
</a><form name="searchForm" method="get" action="https://search.ahrq.gov/search" id="banner_searchform">
<label for="search" style="z-index:-1;position:relative;margin-right:-65px; font-size:0px;">Search</label>
<input name="q" type="text" value=" Search Archive" size="11" onfocus="this.value='';" class="gotext" label="Search archive" id="search" />
<input type="hidden" name="entqr" value="0" />
<input type="hidden" name="output" value="xml_no_dtd" />
<input type="hidden" name="proxystylesheet" value="ARCHIVE_Front_End" />
<input type="hidden" name="client" value="ARCHIVE_Front_End" />
<input type="hidden" name="site" value="ARCHIVE_AHRQ_GOV" />
<input src="/images/topbn_GoButton.gif" class="gobtn" name="Submit" onclick="javascript:document.searchForm.submit();" type="image" alt="Search" />
</form>
<a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/" class="ahrqright">www.ahrq.gov</a>
</div><div class="ahrqlinks"><a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/">AHRQ Home&#8212;Live Site</a> | <a href="/">Archive Home</a> | <a href="/sitemap.htm">Site Map</a> <!-- | &nbsp;<img src="/images/envelope1.jpg" alt="" width="21" height="14" /><a href="https://subscriptions.ahrq.gov/service/multi_subscribe.html?code=USAHRQ">E-mail Updates</a> --></div>
</div>
<div id="PrintBanner">
<img src="/images/printbanner_arch.jpg" alt="Archive print banner" />
</div>
<a name="h1"></a>
<!-- End banner code -->
<!-- End of Page header --><!-- Content Body -->
<div id="mainContent"> <!-- Center Content section -->
<table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="margin-left:10px; margin-right:10px;margin-top:5px" >
<!--DWLayoutTable-->
<tr valign="top">
<td class="crumb_link"><div id="crumbContent">
<p><strong>You Are Here:</strong> <span class="crumb_link"><a href="/" class="crumb_link">AHRQ Archive Home</a> &gt; <a href="/hcqual/" class="crumb_link">President's Advisory Commission on Consumer Protection and Quality in the Health Care Industry</a> &gt; <a href="/hcqual/final/" class="crumb_link">Quality First: Better Health Care for All Americans</a> </p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><div id="centerContent">
<br />
<div class="headnote">
<p>This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: <a href="https://info.ahrq.gov/">https://info.ahrq.gov</a>. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information. </p>
<p>Please go to <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/">www.ahrq.gov</a> for current information.</p></div><br /><br />
<font face="arial" size="-1">
<h1>Summary of Recommendations</h1>
<h2>Providing Strong Leadership and Clear Aims for Improvement</h2>
<p><strong>The President should provide strong, continuous leadership to develop a
broad national consensus on improving the quality of health care in the United
States. </strong>The President should begin this effort by articulating and
continuing to emphasize a unifying statement of purpose for the health care
system. The President should then work with the Congress and leaders of the
public and private sectors to embrace this statement of purpose and to initiate
collaborative efforts for improving health care.</p>
<p>The Commission suggests the following statement: <em>&quot;The purpose of
the health care system must be to continuously reduce the impact and burden of
illness, injury, and disability, and to improve the health and functioning of
the people of the United States</em>.&quot; </p>
<p><strong>National aims for improvement of health care quality should be
established, accompanied by appropriate, specific objectives for improvement.</strong>
The first step toward improving the quality of health care is the creation of a
concise set of national aims for improvement. To encourage the greatest
possible gains in the health of the American people, these aims should be based
on criteria that include focusing on common and/or costly conditions, areas
where wide variability in practices exists, and improvements that have the
greatest impact on reducing morbidity and mortality and improving functional
capacity. Setting national improvement aims, accompanied by a commitment by all
participants to support and practice evidence-based care, can enhance Americans'
access to appropriate, affordable health care.</p>
<p>The Commission suggests that an initial set of national aims should include,
but not be limited to, the following:</p>
<ul>
<li> Reducing the underlying causes of illness, injury, and disability.</li>
<li> Expanding research on new treatments and evidence on effectiveness.</li>
<li> Assuring the appropriate use of health care services.</li>
<li> Reducing health care errors.</li>
<li> Addressing oversupply and undersupply of health care resources.</li>
<li> Increasing patients' participation in their care.
</li></ul>
<p>Measurable objectives within each of these aims should be specified and
developed, including objectives that focus on the unique needs of local areas,
individuals with chronic illness and disability, and other vulnerable
populations. These aims and objectives should be revised over time as
improvements occur and new concerns arise.</p>
<p><strong>An annual award for excellence in health care quality should be
established. </strong>The Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award has served as a
tremendous incentive for organizational quality improvement. It should be
expanded to include an annual award program for health care quality to increase
public awareness of health care excellence, motivate organizations to improve
quality, encourage dissemination of best practices, and recognize achievement in
areas established as national aims for improvement.</p>
<h2>Advancing Quality Measurement and Reporting</h2>
<p><strong>Core sets of quality measures should be identified for standardized
reporting by each sector of the health care industry.</strong> These sets should
reflect measurement priorities developed by taking into account both national
aims for improvement and the information needs of consumers (especially
vulnerable populations), purchasers, providers, health organizations, and public
health and policy officials. Pertinent measures developed by the research
community, quality oversight organizations, health care organizations, and
others should be evaluated for potential inclusion in these reporting sets.</p>
<p><strong>A framework and capacity for quality measurement and reporting should be
developed in tandem with the standardization of quality measures for reporting.
</strong>Specific functions to be undertaken include:</p>
<ul>
<li> Articulating a strategy for measuring and reporting on quality.</li>
<li> Setting quality measurement priorities.</li>
<li> Building a consensus on measures' validity, utility, and meaningfulness.</li>
<li> Working through complex and sensitive issues of public disclosure with
respect to privacy, confidentiality, and liability.</li>
<li> Launching a public education and communication campaign.</li>
<li> Ensuring that there is an ongoing research agenda and capacity for
advancement.</li></ul>
<p><strong>All sectors of the health care industry should support the focused
development of quality measures that enhance and improve the ability to evaluate
and improve health care.</strong> Comprehensive sets of quality measures are needed
to reflect the full continuum of health care, but measures currently are lacking
in a number of important areas. Types of measures that are needed include: </p>
<ul>
<li> Measures of aspects of health care that are not well addressed by existing
measures (e.g., care for chronic conditions and disabilities, mental health
care, and interpersonal aspects of health care).</li>
<li> A wider range of health care outcome measures, including functional
outcomes.</li>
<li> Measures that provide meaningful information about quality at the
individual practitioner level.</li>
<li> Summary measures that address quality across multiple dimensions.
</li></ul>
<p><strong>Quality measurement requirements and the detailed specifications for
measurement and reporting should be determined through a stable and predictable
mechanism.</strong> The Commission's specific recommendations on the creation of
such a stable and predictable mechanism&#8212;a Forum for Health Care Quality
Measurement and Reporting&#8212;are described in Chapter 5.</p>
<p>This entity, which would be responsible for designating core sets of
measures for reporting for each sector of the health care industry, should:</p>
<ul>
<li> Have the organizational capacity to act in a timely and nimble manner (to
be flexible and responsive to the evolving health system).</li>
<li> Involve stakeholders and represent the interests of users of information
on quality.</li>
<li> Provide for public input and public deliberation.</li>
<li> Be structured in such a manner to avoid conflicts of interest.
</li></ul>
<p><strong>Steps should be taken to ensure that comparative information on health
care quality is valid, reliable, comprehensible, and widely available in the
public domain.</strong> Specifically:</p>
<ul>
<li> Definitions, data sources, and measurement methods that are used for
evaluating quality in specific conceptual areas (e.g., pediatric immunization
rates) should be uniform and consistent over time.
</li>
<li> Information on quality should be adjusted for risk, when appropriate,
prior to public release.
</li>
<li> Information on quality that is released to the general public to
facilitate comparisons among health care organizations, providers, or
practitioners should be externally audited by an independent entity.
</li>
<li> Quality measurement findings should be reported through multiple modes and
in user-friendly language to facilitate comprehension and action. Such
information should be made available in a manner that is affordable to
individual consumers.
</li></ul>
<h2>Creating Public-Private Partnerships</h2>
<p><strong>An Advisory Council for Health Care Quality should be created in the
public sector to provide ongoing national leadership in promoting and guiding
continuous improvement of health care quality.</strong> The expert Advisory Council
would identify national aims and specific objectives for improvement and would
establish goals and objectives for systemwide quality measurement. It also would
track and report on the Nation's progress in (1) achieving the national aims for
improvement; (2) undertaking related quality measurement and reporting; and (3)
implementing the Consumer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. The Advisory
Council's additional responsibilities would be to provide a public forum for to
address quality improvement and consumer protection issues, assess relevant
policy proposals, make recommendations on strategies for quality improvement,
develop and promote an agenda for quality research, track key health system
indicators, support and foster approaches to improve the dissemination of
effective health care practices, and guide public education and communication
efforts pertaining to quality. The Advisory Council would issue an annual
public report on the findings from its tracking activities and recommendations
for any steps needed to improve.</p>
<p><strong>A Forum for Health Care Quality Measurement and Reporting should be
created in the private sector to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of
health care quality measurement and reporting.</strong> The Forum would define a
comprehensive plan for implementing quality measurement, data collection, and
reporting standards consistent with the national aims and the goals and
objectives for quality measurement put forward by the Advisory Council. The
objective of this plan would be to assure the widespread public availability of
comparative information on the quality of care furnished by each sector of the
health care industry, to be accomplished through the coordinated efforts of
existing quality measurement organizations and initiatives. The Forum would be
responsible for identifying and updating core sets of quality measures and
standardized reporting methods. The Forum's work also would focus on
establishing measurement priorities, soliciting the voluntary participation of
key organizations, assessing the use of the core sets of measures and the extent
of publicly available information generated through reporting efforts, providing
input to an agenda for research on quality measurement, developing strategies
for quality information dissemination and public education on measurement
issues, and fostering development of improved health information systems.</p>
<h2>Encouraging Action by Group Purchasers</h2>
<p><strong>Group purchasers, to the extent feasible, should provide their
individual members with a choice of plans. </strong>Where group purchasers are not
able to offer a choice of health plans, they should provide for adequate input
from employees in the development of the criteria and selection of the health
plan to be offered.</p>
<p><strong>State and Federal governments should create further opportunities for
small employers to participate in larger purchasing pools that, to the extent
feasible, make a commitment to individual choice of plans. </strong>State and
Federal policymakers should take action to foster the creation of more group
purchasing coalitions for small purchasers by examining insurance rating rules
and Federal tax policies that serve as disincentives to the formation of
coalitions. State and Federal governments, foundations, and others should
explore the option of providing &quot;seed money&quot; to groups of small
purchasers to foster the creation of larger, gateway.html consumer-choice
purchasing coalitions. State and Federal governments also should explore opening
public employee health benefit programs to participation by small group
purchasers. Opening public employee programs should be carefully studied and
analyzed, including the results of previous such efforts, prior to
implementation to assess feasibility, cost implications, risk selection issues,
and unintended consequences.</p>
<p><strong>All public and private group purchasers should use quality as a factor
in selecting the plans they will offer to their individual members, employees,
or beneficiaries. </strong>Significant strides have been made by leading group
purchasers in the pursuit of value-based purchasing, but further efforts should
be made to encourage widespread adoption of best practices throughout the
industry. It is critically important that information on quality and cost be
considered and acted upon when making purchasing decisions. Group purchasers
should share with their individual members/ beneficiaries/employees the
information on quality, cost, and other factors that led to their decision to
offer certain health plans. Consideration should be given to providing the
Medicare program with greater flexibility to selectively contract on the basis
of quality after full exploration of implications for quality of care
and unintended consequences.</p>
<p><strong>Group purchasers should implement strategies to stimulate ongoing
improvements in health care quality. </strong>Large purchasers, in particular, will
need to continue to exercise leadership by undertaking such initiatives, which
often are resource intensive but lead to improvements in quality for all
recipients of health care. Such approaches include: using financial
incentives to encourage exemplary performance; undertaking collaborative
activities with their contractors; and participation in local, State or national
health care quality improvement efforts.</p>
<h2>Strengthening the Hand of Consumers</h2>
<p><strong>A widespread and ongoing consumer education strategy should be developed
to deliver accurate and reliable information about health care quality to
consumers and encourage them to consider information on quality when choosing
health plans, providers, and treatments. </strong>Education should address how health
care experts define and identify good quality health care; how quality can vary
across plans, facilities, health care organizations, and providers; why quality
should be an important factor in making health care purchasing decisions; how to
obtain comparative information on quality, their rights and responsibilities as
health care purchasers and patients, and how they can play a role in improving
health care quality.</p>
<p><strong>Information on health care quality should be developed to meet the needs
of consumers</strong>. Entities promulgating quality measures should obtain consumer
input on issues consumers value and on the design of information reports that
are intended, in part or in whole, for consumer use. Quality measures should be
developed that are of interest to consumers in general, as well as consumers
with particular health concerns (e.g., those with chronic or terminal illness,
those receiving home care, those living with physical or mental disabilities,
and those concerned with care of children).</p>
<p><strong>Credible and stable programs are needed to produce and disseminate
information for consumers.</strong> Current consumer information initiatives are
carried out by numerous organizations including employee benefit managers, labor
unions, health care organizations, and ombuds programs. Such diversity is to be
encouraged as are public and private sector partnerships in producing such
information. Public and private group purchasers, health care organizations and
governmental agencies are encouraged to provide stable and ongoing funding for
such initiatives. Grant-making institutions (both foundations and governmental
organizations providing research and demonstration funding) are encouraged to
provide seed money for local consumer information initiatives.</p>
<p><strong>Some consumers require assistance in making informed health care
decisions about their health plans, professionals, and facilities</strong>. This
assistance can come from a variety of sources including employee benefit
managers, unions, public programs, health care organizations, and independent
ombuds programs. Certain vulnerable individuals (e.g. those with low literacy,
complex chronic conditions, or language or other cultural barriers) will require
more intensive and specialized forms of assistance. Foundations, other research
and grant-making institutions, Federal and State governments, group purchasers
and other public and private coalitions should fund consumer information and
assistance demonstration programs with strong evaluation components.</p>
<p><strong>Further research addressing use of information by consumers is needed.
</strong> Public and private grant- making institutions and researchers should pursue
a vigorous research agenda to enhance understanding of how information on
quality is and can be used by consumers in their purchasing decisions; how
consumers value and use different types of quality information; differences in
values among populations (e.g., with different educational, cultural,
socioeconomic and health status); and effective dissemination strategies for
consumer information.</p>
<h2>Focusing on Vulnerable Populations</h2>
<p><strong>Additional investment should be provided for developing, evaluating, and
supporting effective health care delivery models designed to meet the specific
needs of vulnerable populations.</strong> The lack of evidence of effective
approaches to enhance the health and functional status of persons with chronic
illness or disabilities suggests the need for significant additional investment
in research and innovation for health care and rehabilitation programs serving
these patients. In addition, telemedicine and similar innovations, incentives
for health care professionals to practice in underserved areas, and enhanced
availability of prehospital emergency services should be assessed as approaches
for improving the access to care of those facing geographic barriers to
appropriate care.</p>
<p><strong>Development and evaluation of health care quality measures and
measurement methods for vulnerable populations should be supported. </strong>A focus
on vulnerable populations in the design of quality measurement initiatives is
valuable, in part, because their experiences may provide new insight on
systemwide problems. Attention to vulnerable populations should be integrated
within general quality measurement strategies, recognizing that quality measures
and measurement methods tailored to vulnerable groups will, in some cases, be
required.</p>
<p><strong>Payments to health plans and providers should promote quality health
care and improved health and functional status for all patients, including
vulnerable populations. </strong> Adjusting payments for differences in health or
functional status is especially important for Medicare, Medicaid, and other
payers that have significant enrollment of individuals with chronic illness or
disability so that health plans and providers have an incentive for developing
innovative models of care that best serve these individuals. Risk-adjusted
payments are also critical to sustaining the safety-net mission of certain
providers that provide a disproportionate amount of care to vulnerable
populations, such as community health centers, rural health clinics, and
academic health centers. The Federal Government should convene high-level
stakeholders to determine how best to implement risk-adjusted payments for
Medicare. Payment systems also can be better aligned with quality care for
vulnerable populations by being broadly based across groups of providers and
related health care services to encourage multidisciplinary, coordinated care;
providing coverage for health care delivery approaches that have been
demonstrated to improve outcomes, functional status, and satisfaction; and
rewarding quality performance through financial incentives.</p>
<h2>Promoting Accountability</h2>
<p><strong>Public and private sector Quality Oversight Organizations (QOOs) and
group purchasers should incorporate the provisions of the Consumer Bill of
Rights and Responsibilities into their contractual and oversight requirements.</strong>
The Advisory Council on Health Care Quality should: annually report on the
extent to which public and private quality oversight organizations and group
purchasers have incorporated the provisions of the Consumer Bill of Rights and
Responsibilities into contractual and oversight requirements, issue a
comprehensive evaluation in the year 2000 on the extent of compliance with the
Consumer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities and, if necessary, make
recommendations for enhancing compliance.</p>
<p><strong>Quality Oversight Organizations should make a commitment to participate
in the work of the Advisory Council on Health Care Quality and the Forum for
Health Care Quality Measurement and Reporting. </strong> The Forum is a voluntary,
private sector approach intended to produce an efficient and comprehensive
approach to quality measurement and reporting by promoting collaboration across
existing QOOs. The Council, in its annual reports, should evaluate the success
of this approach in obtaining the cooperation of QOOs.</p>
<p><strong>Quality Oversight Organizations should take steps to increase public
confidence in their oversight processes.</strong> QOOs can accomplish this by:
expanding the representation of consumers on governing boards and committees
that establish oversight standards and make determinations; providing for public
review of and deliberation on existing and proposed standards; making standards
and survey protocols used to reach licensing, certification, and accreditation
decisions (as well as results of oversight processes) available to the public at
little or no cost; and fully disclosing all funding sources. Alternative
funding mechanisms for accreditation processes should be explored to further
minimize conflicts of interest and equitably spread the costs of oversight
across all health care organizations. QOOs also should assure adequate input
from health care workers into their oversight processes and enhance mechanisms
to assess the care of vulnerable populations.</p>
<p><strong>Quality Oversight Organizations should take steps to move to a common
set of quality standards for each sector of the health care industry (i.e.,
health plans, facilities, and other health care entities). </strong>These standards
should be strongly oriented to quality improvement and should be required of all
entities within each sector of the industry. </p>
<p><strong>Quality Oversight Organizations should coordinate their quality
oversight processes within the health care industry. </strong> Once common standards
are agreed upon, use of one oversight organization's findings to satisfy another
oversight organization's need for assurance on the same standard(s) (i.e., &quot;deeming&quot;)
should be pursued so long as standards to ensure public confidence in, and the
integrity of, oversight processes and accountability to the public are in place.</p>
<h2>Reducing Errors and Increasing Safety in Health Care</h2>
<p><strong>Interested parties should work together to develop a health care error
reporting system to identify errors and prevent their recurrence.</strong> The
Federal Aviation Administration's Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) may
provide a useful model for a blame-free system of error reporting.</p>
<p><strong>Internal and external appeals processes should be enhanced to assure
compliance with the Consumer Bill of Rights and Responsibilities. </strong>The
Department of Labor should expedite its review of options to assure a timely
internal process for consumer complaints and appeals to help reduce the
incidence of injury. Public and private purchasers should work quickly to
implement complaint and appeal processes consistent with the Consumer Bill of
Rights and Responsibilities.</p>
<p><strong>Policy makers and other stakeholders should engage in a national
dialogue regarding the current state of existing remedies for individuals in
public or private plans who are injured as a result of inappropriate health care
decisions. They should carefully consider the cost and intended and unintended
consequences of both the status quo as well as any revisions to existing policy.</strong></p>
<h2>Fostering Evidence-Based Practice and Innovation</h2>
<p><strong>Federal funding for health care research, including basic, clinical,
prevention, and health services research, should be increased and the necessary
research infrastructure supported.</strong> Strong Federal funding and support for
sustaining the network of research centers through the National Institutes of
Health, the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, and other agencies is the cornerstone of a robust health
care research enterprise and, in turn, a high quality health care system.</p>
<p><strong>Collaborative arrangements between researchers and public and private
sector organizations supporting research should be developed to provide
additional funding for research, make patients available for approved clinical
trials, and provide training opportunities. </strong>Private sources, including
pharmaceutical and health care supply manufacturers, health plans, and
foundations are increasingly important for funding health care research. A
summit meeting of key leaders in research, including academic health centers,
government, health plans, health care professionals, pharmaceutical and
equipment manufacturers, and not-for-profit foundations is a positive first step
in furthering collaborative relationships. In addition, the NIH Clinical
Research Panel's interim recommendations provide a strong starting point for
enhancing training and career opportunities for researchers.</p>
<p><strong>Research should be targeted to address areas where the greatest
improvements in health and functional status of the population can occur and
where gaps in knowledge exist. </strong>The establishment of national aims for
improvement can provide guidance in setting an appropriate research agenda.
Research should be focused on preventing, diagnosing, and treating conditions
that are prevalent, costly, and where needed improvements are most likely to
occur. </p>
<p><strong>Public and private sector organizations should pursue greater
collaboration in conducting health care technology assessments. </strong>The current
pluralistic approach to technology assessment can be improved through developing
an online directory of existing and ongoing technology assessments and
developing a process for organizations relying on technology assessments to
provide feedback to researchers regarding areas where additional research is
needed to evaluate the effectiveness of health care practices.</p>
<p><strong>More complete and rapid dissemination of effective health care practices
should be supported by encouraging public and private organizations to
collaboratively share knowledge of innovations, synthesize evidence on effective
health care practices, develop practice protocols, disseminate this information,
and provide technical assistance to practitioners. </strong> Synthesizing the
existing clinical literature and developing practice guidelines are essential
steps in support of evidence-based health care practices. To encourage their
acceptance, practice guidelines should be developed by credible sources, allow
for local adaptation, actively involve local clinical leaders, and enable
practitioners to use clinical judgment in determining their applicability to
particular patients. Because merely disseminating information has proven
insufficient to ensure the widespread diffusion of effective health care
practices, these efforts should be accompanied by technical assistance and
implementation programs that encourage the adoption of effective health care
practices.</p>
<h2>Adapting Organizations for Change</h2>
<p><strong>Health care organizations should provide strong leadership to confront
quality challenges.</strong> Organizations should develop a culture that is
supportive of leadership, innovation, and risk taking. They should strive to
attract, reward, and retain strong leaders while providing mentoring
opportunities for new generations of leaders. Educational institutions should
build organizational leadership into their curriculum. Professional
associations and labor unions should establish aims for improvement of their
professions and make quality improvement an integral part of their agendas.</p>
<p><strong>Organizations should establish and pursue aims for improvement.</strong>
Organizations should be supportive of national efforts to establish aims for
improvement and provide local leadership in their communities to achieve those
aims (see Chapter 3).</p>
<p><strong>Organizations should become skilled at using and learning from
quantitative information to measure progress toward quality improvement.</strong>
The key goal should be to improve the performance of systems of care as a whole
rather than improving parts of the system at the expense of the whole. There
should be a commitment to evidence-based health care with processes put in place
to systematically reevaluate established practices.</p>
<p><strong>Organizations should commit themselves to continuous improvement and the
elimination of waste.</strong> Health care organizations should recognize that most
quality problems are due to faulty processes not individuals' failings. A clear
link should be established between quality improvement and the elimination of
wasteful processes.</p>
<p><strong>Organizations should make a commitment to reduce error and increase
safety.</strong> The health care industry should examine the possibility of
establishing a national system for reporting and tracking errors. Changes in
medical malpractice, tort, and quality oversight systems are also needed to
create a climate in which errors can be more readily reported, analyzed, and
prevented, while still providing fair and equitable compensation to victims of
error (see Chapter 10).</p>
<p><strong>Organizations should build long-term relationships with all
stakeholders.</strong> Contracts with suppliers and other vendors should build
quality improvement into long-term planning.</p>
<p><strong>Organizations should commit themselves to fundamental change in their
work environment, involving and empowering all employees. </strong> Employees should
feel free to report errors and instances of improper care, as well as suggest
innovations, regardless of their position within an organization. </p>
<h2>Engaging the Health Care Workforce</h2>
<p><strong>The training of physicians, nurses, and other health care workers must
change to meet the demands of a changing health care industry. </strong> Education
and training of health workers should provide those individuals with greater
experience in working in interdisciplinary teams, the provision of care in
nonhospital settings, the effective use of clinical information to promote
evidence-based practice, the measurement and improvement of quality and
satisfaction, the conducting of small-scale experiments of new ideas, and the
reporting and reduction of error. </p>
<p><strong>Minimum standards for education, training, and supervision of unlicensed
paraprofessionals should be established.</strong> Current oversight of
paraprofessional health care workers is very uneven especially among
multiskilled paraprofessionals. There is a clear need for greater research into
the type of training such individuals require, the kinds of tasks they are
assigned, and the relationship of those factors to quality. Such research
should pay special attention to rapidly expanding sectors of the industry,
including home care and community-based care, where unevenness of quality,
training and supervision appear to be matters of some urgency.</p>
<p><strong>Further steps must be taken to improve the diversity and the cultural
competence of the health care workforce, as well as to provide training in the
treatment of chronic conditions and disabilities.</strong> Despite the strong
efforts of many educational institutions, the health care workforce is still not
fully representative of the broad diversity of the American people. Differences
in cultural experience between caregivers and the people they care for can give
rise to miscommunication and problems in health care quality. Educational
institutions, supported by public and private entities where necessary, should
continue their efforts to diversify the health care workforce and make cultural
competence an important part of the educational experience of all health care
workers.</p>
<p><strong>Health care workers must be encouraged to identify and report clinical
errors and instances of improper or dangerous care. </strong> Health care
organizations should ensure that they have appropriate internal processes and
support to obtain workers' input and respond to concerns in a timely fashion.
Accreditation organizations should provide greater opportunities for health care
workers to provide input on quality-of-care issues. Health care workers who
report improper, illegal, or dangerous care to management, accreditation
organizations, public agencies, or others must be protected against retaliatory
action.</p>
<p><strong>Action must be taken to reduce the unacceptably high rate of injury in
the health care workplace.</strong> The Occupational Safety and Health
Administration's special emphasis program in the nursing home industry should be
used as a model for additional collaborative approaches to identifying and
abating occupational hazards in the health care workplace.</p>
<p><strong>Efforts must be taken to address the serious morale problems that exist
among health care workers in many sectors of the industry.</strong> Health care
organizations should acknowledge morale problems by taking steps to address the
concerns of physicians, nurses, and other health care workers regarding
professional autonomy, rising workloads, nonproductive paperwork, and employment
security. Organizations undergoing restructuring should involve their employees
in the planning and implementation of such changes. Federal and State
governments should make funds available to retrain health care workers at risk
of dislocation, conduct research into workforce trends, and disseminate
information on model workplace partnerships.</p>
<p><strong>Further research should be conducted into how changes in the roles and
responsibilities of health care workers are affecting quality.</strong> Federal and
State governments as well as private foundations should make funds available to
conduct such research. Health care organizations should be open to
participating in such research.</p>
<h2>Investing in Information Systems</h2>
<p><strong>Purchasers of health care services should insist that providers and
plans be able to produce quantitative evidence of quality as a means of
encouraging investment in information systems. </strong> Under the auspices of the
Forum for Health Care Quality Measurement and Reporting, group purchasers should
work with health plans, providers, quality oversight organizations, and other
stakeholders to implement ever-increasing standards for information systems
capacity.</p>
<p><strong>Standards used by Quality Oversight Organizations (see Chapter 9) for
health care organizations should address health care information systems,
including the automation of clinical information, improvement of data quality,
and participation in regional and/or national health information networks.</strong></p>
<p><strong>National standards for the structure, content, definition, and coding of
health information should be established to support improvements in information
systems.</strong> The Federal Government should consult with public and private
stakeholders to assess what additional standards may be necessary to support
such improvements. Whenever possible, this effort should encourage the
widespread adoption of existing standards and build on the work of existing
public and private entities rather than creating additional layers of oversight.
The need also exists to consider standards as they are developing in the
international marketplace to facilitate the global exchange of medical and
health care information and to drive the development of international standards.</p>
<p><strong>Solo practitioners in rural areas, small group practices, and some
safety net providers may face significant financial barriers to making necessary
investments in information systems. </strong> This is an area where government action
(e.g., subsidies, purchasing cooperatives, tax credits) may be needed, although
the specific form of such action may well vary between localities. </p>
<p><strong>Private and public health care organizations should protect the
confidentiality of individually identifiable health care information by
implementing comprehensive security programs that include employee training,
security audits, and well-defined policies regarding access to different types
of information.</strong></p>
<p><strong>The training of health care professionals should include the use of
information technology in clinical settings.</strong> Graduates of professional
schools should be experienced in the use of automated patient records and
computerized decision-support tools. Education programs for paraprofessionals
and other health care workers should also incorporate training in the use of
information technology. There is a need for continuing education programs to
train the existing health care workforce in the use of these systems. </p>
<p><strong>The health care industry and the public sector should provide support to
demonstration projects that can support information system improvement and
create linkages between various sources of health care information at both the
local and national level.</strong> The success of community health information
networks in California, Wisconsin, Utah and other States suggests that this is a
fertile area for additional research and action. Care needs to be taken to model
success factors of community health information networks because there have also
been numerous failures.</p><br />
<div class="footnote">
<p> The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<!-- End of Center Content section -->
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<!-- End of Content Body -->
<!-- Footer graphic 1.2-->
<table summary="layout" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" width="100%">
<tr>
<td width="125" background="/images/bottom_ahrq_bkg.jpg"><img src="/images/bottom_ahrq_1.jpg" width="125" alt="AHRQ" /></td>
<td width="100%" background="/images/bottom_ahrq_bkg.jpg" ><img src="/images/bottom_ahrq_bkg.jpg" width="10" height="34" alt="" /></td>
<td width="310" background="/images/bottom_ahrq_bkg.jpg"><img src="/images/bottom_ahrq_2.gif" alt="Advancing Excellence in Health Care" width="310" height="34" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<!-- Footer links section -->
<div id="banner_Footer2"><p> <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/">AHRQ Home</a> | <a href="https://info.ahrq.gov" class="footer_navlink">Questions?</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/info/customer.htm" class="footer_navlink">Contact AHRQ</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/sitemap.html" class="footer_navlink">Site Map</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/policy/electronic/accessibility/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Accessibility</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/policy/electronic/privacy/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Privacy
Policy</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/policy/foia/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Freedom of Information Act</a> | <a href="https://www.ahrq.gov/policy/electronic/disclaimers/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Disclaimers</a> | <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/open/recordsandreports/plainwritingact/index.html" class="footer_navlink">Plain Writing Act</a> <br />
<a href="http://www.hhs.gov" class="footer_navlink">U.S. Department of Health &amp; Human Services</a> | <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov" class="footer_navlink">The White House</a> | <a href="http://www.usa.gov" class="footer_navlink">USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web Portal</a></p>
</div>
<div id="banner_Footeraddress"><p>Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality <img src="/images/bottom_dot.gif" alt="" /> 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 <img src="/images/bottom_dot.gif" alt="" /> Telephone: (301) 427-1364</p></div>
<!-- End of Footer links section -->
</body>
</html>