This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Dor, A. and Farley, D.E. (1996)."Payment
source and the cost of
hospital care: Evidence from a multiproduct cost function with
multiple payers." Journal of Health Economics 15, pp.
1-21, 1996.
Hospitals are known to shift unpaid costs from uninsured and
Medicaid patients to privately insured patients in order to
maintain profitability. A recent study shows that they also may
modify the intensity of health care services to bring marginal
costs (costs for additional medical services) more in line with
the level of reimbursement from the patient's insurance plan. The
authors, who formerly were with the Agency for Health Care Policy
and Research, used the Hospital Cost and Utilization Project
(HCUP-2) national database of more than 400 hospitals to compare
the marginal costs of patients for Medicare, Medicaid, private
payers, and uncompensated care from 1985 to 1987. They controlled
for case mix differences by payer class. They found the highest
marginal costs for Medicare ($2,006 in 1987 dollars), followed
closely by private insurers ($1,635). Marginal costs for similar
Medicaid patients tended to be substantially lower ($907) and
were even lower for uninsured patients ($715). Reprints (AHCPR
Publication No. 96-R115) are available from AHCPR.
East, T.D. and Morris, A.H. (1996, April).
"Decision support
systems for management of mechanical ventilation." (AHCPR grant
HS06594). Respiratory Care 41(4), pp. 327-340.
Decision support systems for clinicians who care for patients on
mechanical ventilation may reduce inappropriate therapy and
variation in practice and thus profoundly affect the quality and
cost of care, according to this commentary. The authors outline
the strengths and weaknesses of the tools used for these
decisions, such as computerized references and training
materials, clinical practice guidelines, care paths, and clinical
protocols. They point out that the quality of care increases
commensurately with increases in the level of standardization,
while the cost of care and legal liability decreases, all without
intruding on caregiver autonomy. Decision support systems are not
intended to replace the clinician, but they can contribute to
more efficient and effective respiratory care at a lower cost,
conclude the authors.
Edinger, S., and McCormick, K.A. (1996,
April). "Databases-their use in developing clinical practice
guidelines and
estimating the cost impact of guideline implementation."
Journal
of the American Health Information Management Association 67(4),
pp. 52-60.
This article informs health information management
professionals,
guideline developers, and other health care providers about the
use of health databases in developing practice guidelines and how
these databases can be used to estimate the cost impact of
practice guideline implementation. The authors, who are Senior
Science Advisors in the Agency for Health Care Policy and
Research's Center for Information Technology, describe three
types of databases: those for topic selection, those for
literature review during practice guideline development, and
those for estimating the cost impact of a guideline. These
databases include health survey data, socioeconomic and
demographic data, bibliographic citations and abstract data, and
claims and provider data. Reprints (AHCPR Publication No.
96-R108) are available from AHCPR.
Gifford, F. (1996, March-April). "Outcomes
research and practice
guidelines." (AHCPR grant HS06688). Hastings Center Report 26(2),
pp. 38-44.
The author examines reasons underlying the reluctance of some
clinicians to adopt clinical practice guidelines. Some providers
are skeptical about the validity, reliability, and integrity of
the data used to develop the guidelines. Others are responding to
patients' preferences, clinical expertise, and other data
irrelevant to practice and legal concerns. For example, different
patients may have different attitudes about the importance of
attaining certain health goals and avoiding certain side effects.
Some clinicians also believe that their lifelong experience and
the details of individual cases lead them to make better
judgments that cannot be specified by clinical rules. Also, some
are concerned about the cost-savings aspect of guidelines and its
effect on quality and access to care. The authors suggest that
those promulgating practice guidelines strive to remove
unnecessary barriers to their adoption, for example, by doing a
better job of establishing the credibility of those compiling the
data and making recommendations and providing a more thorough
explanation of the methodology used to analyze and rank the
data.
Green, L.A. (1996, April). "Practical issues
in conducting
small-area variation analysis." (AHCPR grant HS06409). Family
Medicine 28, pp. 277-281.
The study of variations in the use of medical and surgical
services across small geographic areas is called small-area
variation analysis (SAVA). This paper examines the conduct of a
SAVA health services research project to aid other researchers in
performing and interpreting such projects. The author details
each of the steps used in performing SAVA on hospitalizations for
suspected acute cardiac ischemia in the State of Michigan. The
study team consisted of the principal investigator, a
biostatistician, a health economist, a medical geographer, and a
systems analyst. They defined small analysis areas by a patient
origin clustering method and adjusted crude area rates by the age
and sex of the population. Finally, they analyzed the adjusted
rates, including sociodemographic variables. The author concludes
by discussing issues in interpretation of SAVA and practical
barriers to using SAVA to examine primary care.
Newman, S.J., and Reschovsky, J.D. (1996, April).
"Neighborhood
locations of Section 8 housing certificate users with and without
mental illness." Psychiatric Services 47(4), pp.
392-397.
The deinstitutionalization of patients with mental illness often
results in their moving into independent housing using the
Federal Section 8 housing subsidy program, in which participants
pay 30 percent of their income for rent. Some question whether
persons with mental illness face greater public housing
discrimination than their counterparts without mental illness and
whether they are forced to locate in the worst neighborhoods.
Actually, being black more than having a mental illness increased
the odds of obtaining public housing in a worse neighborhood,
according to this study. The researchers evaluated the allocation
of Section 8 certificates between 1988 and 1992 to individuals
with chronic mental illness at two of nine demonstration sites
(Baltimore and Cincinnati) for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Program on Chronic Mental Illness (PCMI). Results showed that
Section 8 users with mental illness settled in slightly better
neighborhoods overall than their general Section 8 counterparts.
The most important factor explaining differences in neighborhood
quality among Section 8 users was race. Blacks located in
lower-quality neighborhoods more often than whites, who made up
the larger proportion of Section 8 users with mental illness.
Return to Contents
Current as of July 1996