Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Chartbook on Care Coordination

Measures of Care Coordination: Transitions of Care

  • Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) defines a transition of care as:
    • The movement of a patient from one setting of care (hospital, ambulatory primary care practice, ambulatory specialty care practice, long-term care, home health, rehabilitation facility) to another.
    • These transitions place patients at heightened risk of adverse events. Important information can be lost or miscommunicated as responsibility is given to new parties.
    • Unsafe transitions of care from the hospital to the community are common and frequently associated with postdischarge adverse events (Forster, et al., 2003).

Measures of Transitions of Care

Measures reported in this section include:

  • Hospitalized adult patients with heart failure who were given complete written discharge instructions.
  • Median hospital 30-day risk standardized readmission rate or certain conditions.
  • Median hospital 30-day risk standardized readmission rate.

Management: Complete Written Discharge Instructions

  • Effective care coordination begins with ensuring that accurate clinical information is available to support medical decisions by patients and providers.
  • A common transition of care is discharge from the hospital.
  • A successful transition depends on whether hospitals have adequately educated patients about key elements of care such as diagnosis and followup plans (Horwitz, et al., 2013).

Complete Written Discharge Instructions

Hospitalized adults with heart failure who were given complete written discharge instructions, by sex and ethnicity, 2005-2012

Charts show hospitalized adults with heart failure who were given complete written discharge instructions, by sex and ethnicity. For details, refer to tables below the image.

Left Chart:

Sex 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Total 57.4 68.7 76 82 86.4 89.7 92 93.5
Female 56.4 67.8 75.1 81.3 85.9 89.4 91.7 93.7
Male 58.3 69.6 76.8 82.7 86.9 90 92.3 93.3

2012 Achievable Benchmark: 96.2%.

Right Chart:

Ethnicity 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
White 58.6 69.5 76.6 82.2 86.3 89.6 91.9 93.4
Black 56.7 68.1 75.8 81.7 86.4 89.8 92.4 93.9
Hispanic 53 65.6 72.6 81.8 88.2 89.8 92.0 93.2
AI/AN 48.2 59.7 65 69.8 76.3 81.9 84.1 86.1
Asian 49.1 61.5 74.6 83.7 87.1 91.6 92.9 94.1

2012 Achievable Benchmark: 96.2%.

Key: AI/AN = American Indian or Alaska Native.
Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Quality Improvement Organization Program, 2005-2012.

  • From 2005 to 2012, the percentage of hospitalized adult patients with heart failure who were given complete written discharge instructions improved from 57.4% to 93.5%.
  • Improvements were observed among both sexes and all racial and ethnic groups.
  • There were no statistically significant differences by sex.
  • In all years from 2005 to 2012, the percentage of hospitalized adult patients with heart failure who were given complete written discharge instructions was lower for American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) than for Whites.
  • The 2012 top 5 State achievable benchmark was 96%. At the current rates of increase, this benchmark could be attained overall and by both sexes in less than a year. All ethnic groups could attain the benchmark in less than a year except AI/ANs, who could achieve the benchmark in about 2 years.
  • The top 5 States that contributed to the achievable benchmark are Illinois, Maine, Ohio, New Hampshire, and New Jersey.

Readmissions:

  • Hospital readmission shortly after discharge is a marker of inpatient quality of care and a significant contributor to rising health care costs (Hasan, 2010).
  • In 2013, approximately two-thirds of U.S. hospitals will be charged financial penalties from CMS because of excessively high 30-day readmission rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia (Rau, 2013).

Risk-Standardized Readmission Rate

Median hospital 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate for certain conditions, 2006-2011

Charts show median hospital 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate for certain conditions. For details, refer to tables below the image.

Year AMI Heart Failure Pneumonia
2006 19.9 24.4 18
2007 20 24.7 18.3
2008 19.9 24.9 18.2
2009 19.7 24.7 18.4
2010 19.4 24.6 18.4
2011 19.7 24.7 18.5

Key: AMI = acute myocardial infarction.
Source: Hospital Compare Chartbook, 2013.
Denominator: Expected number of readmissions for each disease type given the hospital's case mix.
Note: For this measure, lower rates are better.

  • Importance: Although not all hospital readmissions are preventable, readmission rates may show whether a hospital is doing its best to deliver quality care, prevent complications, teach patients at discharge, and ensure that patients make a smooth transition to their home or another setting, such as a nursing home.
  • Overall Rate: The median 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate in 2011 was 19.7% among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 24.7% among patients with heart failure, and 18.5% among patients with pneumonia.
  • Change Over Time: The median 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates for AMI, heart failure, and pneumonia have remained stable from 2006 to 2011.

Median hospital 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate, by the percentage of patients who are African American and the percentage of patients who have Medicaid, 2009-2011

Charts show median hospital 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate, by the percentage of patients who are African American and the percentage of patients who have Medicaid. For details, refer to tables below the image.

Left Chart:

Condition Hospitals With Low African American Patient Share Hospitals With High African American Patient Share
AMI 17.9 18.9
Heart Failure 22.7 23.9
Pneumonia 17.2 18.2

Right Chart:

Condition Hospitals With Low Medicaid Patient Share Hospitals With High Medicaid Patient Share
AMI 18.3 18.6
Heart Failure 22.7 23.7
Pneumonia 17.2 17.8

Key: AMI = acute myocardial infarction.
Source: Hospital Compare Chartbook, 2013.
Denominator: Expected number of readmissions for each disease type given the hospital's case mix.
Note: For this measure, lower rates are better. For a hospital's percentage of patients who are African American, low is defined as 0% for all three measures. High is defined as ≥22% for AMI, ≥23% for heart failure, and ≥22% for pneumonia. For the percentage of the hospital's patients who are insured by Medicaid, low is defined ≤8% for AMI, ≤7% for heart failure, and ≤6% for pneumonia. High is defined as ≥30% for AMI, ≥29% for heart failure, and ≥29% for pneumonia.

  • Importance: Although not all hospital readmissions are preventable, readmission rates may show whether a hospital is doing its best to deliver quality care, prevent complications, teach patients at discharge, and ensure that patients make a smooth transition to their home or another setting, such as a nursing home.
  • Groups With Disparities: The median 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates in 2009-2011 for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure, and pneumonia were similar between hospitals whose patients include a high percentage of African Americans and hospitals whose patients include a low percentage of African Americans. Hospitals whose patients include a high percentage of Medicaid recipients had similar median 30-day risk-standardized readmission rates for each of the three conditions compared with hospitals whose patients include a low percentage of Medicaid recipients.

Return to Contents

Page last reviewed May 2015
Page originally created September 2015

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 

AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care