Skip Navigation Archive: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Archive: Agency for Healthcare Research Quality www.ahrq.gov
AHRQ Home—Live Site | Archive Home | Site Map
Archival print banner

This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.

Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.

Establishing an AHRQ Learning Collaborative, A White Paper

References



  1. Gray, B. Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1989.
  2. Thomson AM, Perry JL. Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Admin Rev 2006 Dec; 20-32.
  3. Gajda R. Utilizing collaboration theory to evaluate strategic alliances. Amer J Eval 2004; 25: 65-77.
  4. Contandriopoulos D, Lemire M, Denis J, Tremblay E. Knowledge exchange processes in organizations and policy arenas: A narrative systematic review of the literature. Milbank Q 2010; 88(4):444-483.
  5. What is knowledge translation? Technical Brief No. 10. Austin, TX: National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research; 2005.
  6. Knowledge translation strategy 2004-2009: Innovation in action. Ottawa, Ontario: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2004.
  7. Waters L. Enemies of promise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2004.
  8. Szulanski G. The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organization Behav Human Decision Proc 2000; 82(1):9-27.
  9. Ring PS, Van de Ven AH. (1994). Development processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. 1994; Acad Manage Rev 19(1):90-118.
  10. Alexander J, Christianson JB, Hearld LR, et al. Challenges of capacity building in multisector community health alliances. Health Educ Behav 2010; 37(5):645-664.
  11. Kim WC, Mauborgne R. Fair process: Managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Bus Rev 2003 Jan; 81(1):127-136. Accessed February 23, 2012.
  12. Van der Hayden L, Blondel C, Carlock R. Fair process: Striving for justice in family business. Family Bus Rev 2005; 18(1):1-21.
  13. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
  14. Wenger EC, Snyder WM. Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Bus Rev 2000 Jan-Feb; 139:145.
  15. Wenger EC. Communities of practice: A brief introduction. June 2006.
  16. Schein E. Helping: How to offer, give, and receive help. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers; 2009. p 9.
  17. Wilson EJ, Bunn MD, Savage GT. Anatomy of a social partnership: A stakeholder perspective. Industrial Market Manage, 2010; 39:76-90.
  18. Bunderson JS, Sutcliffe KM. Why some teams emphasize learning more than others: Evidence from business unit management teams. In Neal M, Mannix E, Sondak H, eds, Research on managing groups and teams. New York: Elsevier; 2002.
  19. Ancona D, Bresman H. X-teams: How to build teams that lead, innovate, and succeed. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press; 2007.
  20. Cross R, Parker A. The hidden power of social networks. Cambridge: The Harvard Business Press; 2006.
  21. Garvin D, Tahilyani R. MindTree: A community of communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press (9-311-049); 2010.
  22. Katzenbach JR, Smith DK. The wisdom of teams: Creating the high-performance organization. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press; 2003.
  23. MIT news. Putting heads together: New study—groups demonstrate distinctive 'collective intelligence' when facing difficult tasks. October 1, 2010. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  24. MIT Center for Collective Intelligence. Home page; 2012. Available at http://cci.mit.edu/. Accessed March 19, 2012.
  25. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. IHI's collaborative model for achieving breakthrough improvement. Cambridge: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2003.
  26. Knowledge Translation Canada. KT Clearinghouse. Accessed March 6, 2012.
  27. The NEWMEDS Project. Novel methods leading to medications in depression and schizophrenia. Accessed March 6, 2012.
  28. CEEDD: Centre of Excellence for External Drug Discovery. Accessed March 6, 2012.
  29. PALISI Network: A Pediatric Critical Care Clinical Research Network. Accessed March 6, 2012.
  30. Medical Home/Meaningful Use Collaborative for 12 NYC Safety Net Providers. Accessed March 6, 2012.
  31. AcademyHealth. HSR Consortium. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  32. AcademyHealth. Student chapters. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  33. AcademyHealth. Training and professional resources. Retrieved May 12, 2011.
  34. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Health services research core competencies: Final report for conference grant R13 HS016070-01. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005. Retrieved March 8, 2012.
  35. Lohr K, Steinwachs D. Health services research: An evolving definition of the field. Health Services Research 2002; 37(1):7-9.
  36. Forrest C, Martin D, Holve E, Millman A. Health services research doctoral core competencies. BMC Health Services Research 2009; 9(1):107.
  37. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Health services research core competencies: Final report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008. Retrieved March 8, 2012.
Page last reviewed October 2014
Page originally created March 2012
Internet Citation: References. Content last reviewed October 2014. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. https://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/learningcollab/learningref.html

The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.

 
AHRQ Advancing Excellence in Health Care