This information is for reference purposes only. It was current when produced and may now be outdated. Archive material is no longer maintained, and some links may not work. Persons with disabilities having difficulty accessing this information should contact us at: https://info.ahrq.gov. Let us know the nature of the problem, the Web address of what you want, and your contact information.
Please go to www.ahrq.gov for current information.
Page 1 of 1
Table 2. SQUIRE: Relevant elements
Assessing the Evidence for Context-Sensitive Effectiveness and Safety
Describes the intervention and its component parts in sufficient detail that others could reproduce it.
Indicates main factors that contributed to choice of the specific intervention (for example, analysis of causes of dysfunction; matching relevant improvement experience of others with the local situation).
Outlines initial plans for how the intervention was to be implemented: e.g., what was to be done (initial steps; functions to be accomplished by those steps; how tests of change would be used to modify intervention), and by whom (intended roles, qualifications, and training of staff).
Results
Outcomes.
Explains the actual course of the intervention (for example, sequence of steps, events or phases; type and number of participants at key points), preferably using a time-line diagram or flow chart.
Documents degree of success in implementing intervention components.
Describes how and why the initial plan evolved and the most important lessons learned from that evolution, particularly the effects of internal feedback from tests of change (reflexiveness).
Internet Citation: Table 2. SQUIRE: Relevant elements: Assessing the Evidence for Context-Sensitive Effectiveness and Safety .
December 2010. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://archive.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/contextsensitive/contexttab2.html
The information on this page is archived and provided for reference purposes only.