Use reset-previous-blocks meta action; generate more code blocks.

docs/docsite/rst/filter_guide-abstract_informations-lists_of_dictionaries-keep_keys.rst

@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ Use the filter :ansplugin:`community.general.keep_keys#filter` if you have a lis
 
 Let us use the below list in the following examples:
 
+.. ansible-output-meta::
+
+  actions:
+    - name: reset-previous-blocks
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
    input:

docs/docsite/rst/filter_guide-abstract_informations-lists_of_dictionaries-remove_keys.rst

@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ Use the filter :ansplugin:`community.general.remove_keys#filter` if you have a l
 
 Let us use the below list in the following examples:
 
+.. ansible-output-meta::
+
+  actions:
+    - name: reset-previous-blocks
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
    input:

docs/docsite/rst/filter_guide-abstract_informations-lists_of_dictionaries-replace_keys.rst

@@ -13,6 +13,11 @@ Use the filter :ansplugin:`community.general.replace_keys#filter` if you have a
 
 Let us use the below list in the following examples:
 
+.. ansible-output-meta::
+
+  actions:
+    - name: reset-previous-blocks
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
    input:

docs/docsite/rst/filter_guide_abstract_informations_lists_helper.rst

@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ These filters preserve the item order, eliminate duplicates and are an extended
 
 Let us use the lists below in the following examples:
 
+.. ansible-output-meta::
+
+  actions:
+    - name: reset-previous-blocks
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
   A: [9, 5, 7, 1, 9, 4, 10, 5, 9, 7]
@@ -35,9 +40,42 @@ The union of ``A`` and ``B`` can be written as:
 
 This statement produces:
 
+.. ansible-output-data::
+
+    env:
+      ANSIBLE_CALLBACK_RESULT_FORMAT: yaml
+    variables:
+      data:
+        previous_code_block: yaml
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
+      computation:
+        previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
+    postprocessors:
+      - name: reformat-yaml
+    language: yaml
+    skip_first_lines: 2
+    playbook: |-
+      - hosts: localhost
+        gather_facts: false
+        tasks:
+          - vars:
+              @{{ data | indent(8) }}@
+              @{{ computation | indent(8) }}@
+            ansible.builtin.debug:
+              var: result
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
-  result: [9, 5, 7, 1, 4, 10, 2, 8, 3]
+  result:
+    - 9
+    - 5
+    - 7
+    - 1
+    - 4
+    - 10
+    - 2
+    - 8
+    - 3
 
 If you want to calculate the intersection of ``A``, ``B`` and ``C``, you can use the following statement:
 
@@ -59,9 +97,34 @@ or
 
 All three statements are equivalent and give:
 
+.. ansible-output-data::
+
+    env:
+      ANSIBLE_CALLBACK_RESULT_FORMAT: yaml
+    variables:
+      data:
+        previous_code_block: yaml
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
+      computation:
+        previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
+    postprocessors:
+      - name: reformat-yaml
+    language: yaml
+    skip_first_lines: 2
+    playbook: |-
+      - hosts: localhost
+        gather_facts: false
+        tasks:
+          - vars:
+              @{{ data | indent(8) }}@
+              @{{ computation | indent(8) }}@
+            ansible.builtin.debug:
+              var: result
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
-  result: [1]
+  result:
+    - 1
 
 .. note:: Be aware that in most cases, filter calls without any argument require ``flatten=true``, otherwise the input is returned as result. The reason for this is, that the input is considered as a variable argument and is wrapped by an additional outer list. ``flatten=true`` ensures that this list is removed before the input is processed by the filter logic.
 
@@ -75,7 +138,34 @@ For example, the symmetric difference of ``A``, ``B`` and ``C`` may be written a
 
 This gives:
 
+.. ansible-output-data::
+
+    env:
+      ANSIBLE_CALLBACK_RESULT_FORMAT: yaml
+    variables:
+      data:
+        previous_code_block: yaml
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
+      computation:
+        previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
+    postprocessors:
+      - name: reformat-yaml
+    language: yaml
+    skip_first_lines: 2
+    playbook: |-
+      - hosts: localhost
+        gather_facts: false
+        tasks:
+          - vars:
+              @{{ data | indent(8) }}@
+              @{{ computation | indent(8) }}@
+            ansible.builtin.debug:
+              var: result
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
-  result: [5, 8, 3, 1]
-
+  result:
+    - 5
+    - 8
+    - 3
+    - 1

docs/docsite/rst/filter_guide_abstract_informations_merging_lists_of_dictionaries.rst

@@ -12,6 +12,11 @@ If you have two or more lists of dictionaries and want to combine them into a li
 
 Let us use the lists below in the following examples:
 
+.. ansible-output-meta::
+
+  actions:
+    - name: reset-previous-blocks
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
   list1:
@@ -183,6 +188,11 @@ The examples below set :ansopt:`community.general.lists_mergeby#filter:recursive
 
 Let us use the lists below in the following examples
 
+.. ansible-output-meta::
+
+  actions:
+    - name: reset-previous-blocks
+
 .. code-block:: yaml
 
   list1:
@@ -222,7 +232,7 @@ This produces:
     variables:
       data:
         previous_code_block: yaml
-        previous_code_block_index: 4
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
       computation:
         previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
     postprocessors:
@@ -275,7 +285,7 @@ This produces:
     variables:
       data:
         previous_code_block: yaml
-        previous_code_block_index: 4
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
       computation:
         previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
     postprocessors:
@@ -329,7 +339,7 @@ This produces:
     variables:
       data:
         previous_code_block: yaml
-        previous_code_block_index: 4
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
       computation:
         previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
     postprocessors:
@@ -387,7 +397,7 @@ This produces:
     variables:
       data:
         previous_code_block: yaml
-        previous_code_block_index: 4
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
       computation:
         previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
     postprocessors:
@@ -445,7 +455,7 @@ This produces:
     variables:
       data:
         previous_code_block: yaml
-        previous_code_block_index: 4
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
       computation:
         previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
     postprocessors:
@@ -502,7 +512,7 @@ This produces:
     variables:
       data:
         previous_code_block: yaml
-        previous_code_block_index: 4
+        previous_code_block_index: 0
       computation:
         previous_code_block: yaml+jinja
     postprocessors: