diff --git a/Lab_3/Lab_3.ipynb b/Lab_3/Lab_3.ipynb
index 9125c16..fb81863 100644
--- a/Lab_3/Lab_3.ipynb
+++ b/Lab_3/Lab_3.ipynb
@@ -4,14 +4,15 @@
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
- "#
PHYS 134L Spring 2024 Lab 3
"
+ "# PHYS 134L Spring 2025\n",
+ " Lab 3
"
]
},
{
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
- "Due date: Sunday, April 28th, 2024 by 11:59pm, submitted through Gradescope.
"
+ "Due date: Sunday, April 27th, 2024 by 11:59pm, submitted through Gradescope.
"
]
},
{
@@ -304,7 +305,7 @@
"cell_type": "markdown",
"metadata": {},
"source": [
- "Last lab, you estimated the angular sizes of a few stars; the largest size you should have computed was around 2~mas. You also computed the pixel scale in these images; you should have gotten a scale of around $0.^{\\prime \\prime}58$ arcsec/pixel. **Use these two numbers to estimate the angular size of a star in units of pixels. Please show your work for the unit conversion.**"
+ "If you were to estimate the expected sizes of some of the bigget and nearest stars you'd find that they're on the order of a few mas. You also computed the pixel scale in these images; you should have gotten a scale of around $0.^{\\prime \\prime}58$ arcsec/pixel. **Assuming a stellar diameter of 3mas, estimate the angular size of a star in units of pixels. Please show your work for the unit conversion.**"
]
},
{
@@ -640,6 +641,13 @@
"source": [
"*Your answer here*"
]
+ },
+ {
+ "cell_type": "markdown",
+ "metadata": {},
+ "source": [
+ "## Don't forget to restart your JupyterHub Kernel and re-run all of your cells before submitting! "
+ ]
}
],
"metadata": {
diff --git a/Lab_3/cluster.fits b/Lab_3/cluster.fits
index 415b039..92cfc15 100644
Binary files a/Lab_3/cluster.fits and b/Lab_3/cluster.fits differ