diff --git a/Lab_3/Lab_3.ipynb b/Lab_3/Lab_3.ipynb index 9125c16..fb81863 100644 --- a/Lab_3/Lab_3.ipynb +++ b/Lab_3/Lab_3.ipynb @@ -4,14 +4,15 @@ "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ - "#

PHYS 134L Spring 2024 Lab 3

" + "#

PHYS 134L Spring 2025\n", + " Lab 3

" ] }, { "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ - "
Due date: Sunday, April 28th, 2024 by 11:59pm, submitted through Gradescope.
" + "
Due date: Sunday, April 27th, 2024 by 11:59pm, submitted through Gradescope.
" ] }, { @@ -304,7 +305,7 @@ "cell_type": "markdown", "metadata": {}, "source": [ - "Last lab, you estimated the angular sizes of a few stars; the largest size you should have computed was around 2~mas. You also computed the pixel scale in these images; you should have gotten a scale of around $0.^{\\prime \\prime}58$ arcsec/pixel. **Use these two numbers to estimate the angular size of a star in units of pixels. Please show your work for the unit conversion.**" + "If you were to estimate the expected sizes of some of the bigget and nearest stars you'd find that they're on the order of a few mas. You also computed the pixel scale in these images; you should have gotten a scale of around $0.^{\\prime \\prime}58$ arcsec/pixel. **Assuming a stellar diameter of 3mas, estimate the angular size of a star in units of pixels. Please show your work for the unit conversion.**" ] }, { @@ -640,6 +641,13 @@ "source": [ "*Your answer here*" ] + }, + { + "cell_type": "markdown", + "metadata": {}, + "source": [ + "## Don't forget to restart your JupyterHub Kernel and re-run all of your cells before submitting! " + ] } ], "metadata": { diff --git a/Lab_3/cluster.fits b/Lab_3/cluster.fits index 415b039..92cfc15 100644 Binary files a/Lab_3/cluster.fits and b/Lab_3/cluster.fits differ